How does the presence of a metal tube affect the magnetic field in a solenoid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter polaris90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solenoid Work
AI Thread Summary
The presence of a metal tube in a solenoid enhances the magnetic field due to the properties of ferromagnetic materials, which increase permeability. When the metal tube is removed, the magnetic field decreases because the wire alone lacks the magnetic properties needed to strengthen the field. In applications where the solenoid moves an internal armature, a non-magnetic tube is preferred to maintain coil shape without affecting the magnetic field. Conversely, for solenoids acting on external armatures, an iron core significantly boosts the magnetic field. Understanding the role of core materials is crucial for optimizing solenoid performance.
polaris90
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I know an electromagnet can be created by wrapping a wire around a metal tube and putting some current across the wire. This creates a magnetic field. my question is why does the magnetic field decrease when the metal tube is removed leaving just the wire?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends upon what sort of solenoid you refer to.
If the solenoid moves an armature inside the tube then you do not want a core of magnetic material as it will not help to increase the magnetic field affecting the magnetic armature. A non-magnetic tube (former) is just needed to maintain the shape of the coil.

If your solenoid acts on an external armature then an Iron (ferromagnetic) core will increase the field considerably due to the increased Permeability. Non-magnetic metal like aluminium will make no difference.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top