How Does the Reaction Progress Affect Rate in a Second-Order Redox Reaction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the second-order redox reaction between NO2 and CO, where the initial concentration of NO2 is twice that of CO. At 50% completion, the concentration of CO is half of its initial value, while NO2 is reduced to 75% of its initial concentration due to the stoichiometric relationship of the reactants. Participants question the derivation of these values, particularly the 0.75 for NO2, and clarify that it results from the initial ratio and the reaction's stoichiometry. The calculations confirm that if half of the CO reacts, the remaining NO2 aligns with the initial concentration ratio. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing reaction rates in second-order kinetics.
r_swayze
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Experiments show that the following redox reaction is second-order overall:

NO2(g) + CO(g) --> NO(g) + CO2(g)

In the reaction, the initial [NO2] is twice the initial [CO]. What is the ratio of the initial rate to the rate at 50% completion?

In the solution they say: [NO2]i = 2[CO]i

and then at 50% completion they say: [CO] = 1/2[CO]i and [NO2] = 0.75[NO2]i

where they getting the 1/2 and 0.75 from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stoichiometry?

--
methods
 
how? can you show the math behind it?

I don't see how they can get .75 if its at 50% completion. Wouldnt that mean NO2 is at 1.5 and CO is at 1? But they can't be since NO2 is twice the initial CO
 
r_swayze said:
the initial [NO2] is twice the initial [CO]

They react 1:1, if half of the CO reacted, how much NO2 was left?

Edit: note, that 1.5/2=0.75...

--
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top