How does the reflection of light at different angles affect polarization?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how light polarization is affected by the angle of reflection and the role of polarizers. It highlights the application of Malus's law, emphasizing that light can still transmit through a second polarizer even when it seems to have no corresponding component in the desired direction. The conversation explores the concept of light waves as components in different directions and the significance of angles in determining transmission. The analogy of a lattice is questioned, with suggestions for better visualizations, such as a fence, to illustrate polarization. Additionally, the role of Brewster's angle in achieving complete polarization upon reflection is mentioned, referencing the Fresnel equations.
Maxo
Messages
160
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


image.jpg


Homework Equations


c0dda05c393ae8c016461837087b0e25.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that according to the Malus law formula, if the angle is 0 < θ < 90 then there is some transmission. But I need help understanding this physically. If we think of a polarizer/analyzer as a "lattice", i.e. kind of like this
vinyl-pool-fence.jpg
then after having passed through such, the light waves should only be in one direction, right? So how can it then matter what other direction the next lattice (analyzer) is?

Are we supposed to think of the light waves as components in x and y direction? In that case, wouldn't a pure y-direction wave have no x-component? Wouldn't that then happen if you put the polarizer so that it transmits in y direction only? But then it comes back to my original question, why would the direction of the analyzer matter, why wouldn't it only allow transmission when θ = 0?

Please help me understand this further. I understand a lattice is not a perfect visualization of it. What would be a possible better image/object to visualize polarization with than a lattice?
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    51.4 KB · Views: 425
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    5 KB · Views: 386
Physics news on Phys.org
You have three elements in this set up.
The 1st Polarizer produces a wave with no x component.
The insert decomposes this y-vector into two components along the y' and x' directions and blocks one of them - say x'. The analyzer decomposes the y'-vector into components along the y and x directions and blocks the y component. Some light comes through.
Even though a y-vector has not x-component, a y-vector does have a y'-component and the y'-component does have an x-component.
 
dauto said:
You have three elements in this set up.
The 1st Polarizer produces a wave with no x component.
The insert decomposes this y-vector into two components along the y' and x' directions and blocks one of them - say x'. The analyzer decomposes the y'-vector into components along the y and x directions and blocks the y component. Some light comes through.
Even though a y-vector has not x-component, a y-vector does have a y'-component and the y'-component does have an x-component.

What do you mean with x' y'? How are they related to x y?

How can it be visualized what happends with the light as it goes through the filter? Since a "lattice" is not correct, what would be a correct analogy?
 
The picture you provided in the OP has a good visualization. y' is the axis of the insert which is rotated an angle θ from the axis of the 1st polarizer. The OP's picture has everything you need to see what's happening.
 
Do you understand the word analogy?
 
The fence IS a good analogy.
 
Why does sunlight get linearly polarized when reflected from water?
 
Maxo said:
Why does sunlight get linearly polarized when reflected from water?

If you look at Fresnel equations for the reflection of light you will see that the two possible polarizations have different reflectances which leads to partially polarized light. for a specific angle called Brewster's angle the polarization is complete.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top