How Does the Structure of N2 Affect Its Kinetic Energy Calculation?

DanAbnormal
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Just a quickie.

For example, the total kinetic energy of N molecules is

= (3/2)NkT = (3/2)nRT

If a question were to ask you to find the such energy for a sample of N_{2} would it make the equation

(5/2)kT?

Does the subscript 2 make it diatomic, and hence have two molecules, I am not sure, it could cost me marks though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Astronuc said:
If N is the number of molecules, is N2 just a very large number, N-squared.

See this - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html#c1


If E is the average energy per molecule, then the total energy would be NE for N molecules. If one replaces N with N2, what is the result?

Sorry, "N" isn't the number of molecules. Its supposed to be N subscript 2, as in "N" for Nitrogen.
Does the subscript 2 make the N from the equation = 2?
 
Does the subscript 2 make it diatomic, and hence have two molecules

N2 is one molecule composed of two nitrogen atoms connected by a triple bond. You wouldn't have to modify your original equation to do the calculation as far as I can see.
 
N2 is one molecule that consists of two atoms. The average translational kinetic energy of any gas will be (3/2)NkBT.

You may be confusing the average kinetic energy with the heat capacity as the molar heat capacity (Cv). Cv for a diatomic gas is (5/2)kBT, whereas Cv for a monatomic gas is (3/2)kBT. The difference comes because diatomic molecule have rotational modes of motion which can absorb energy whereas monatomic atoms do not. However, the rotation of diatomic molecules does not affect their translational kinetic energy.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top