How Does the Substitution s=1-t Simplify the Integral in Calculating f(π/3)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Azael
  • Start date Start date
Azael
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
the problem is this
f(x)=\int_{1/2}^{sin^2x} \frac{ cos^2t }{ t^2-t }dt - \int_{1/2}^{cos^2x} \frac{sin^2(1-t]}{t^2-t}dt
solve f(\frac{\pi}{3})
They begin by doing the substitution s=1-t on the second integral and it leads to t^2-t=s^2-s and dt=-ds
this leads to the 2 integrals
f(\frac{\pi}{3})=\int_{1/2}^{3/2} \frac{cos^2t}{t^2-t}dt + \int_{1/2}^{3/2} \frac{sin^2s}{s^2-s}ds
they then just make it into
f(\frac{\pi}{3})=\int_{1/2}^{3/2} \frac{1}{t^2-t}dt
Solving that one is a pieace of cake

but its this last step I don't follow. Why can I say that sin^2s+cos^2t=1? How can it be 1 when its 2 different variables??
and why is t^2-t=s^2-s Why can I just replace the s with t's when s isn't equal to t?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to your question is that s and t are dummy variables.
\int f(s)ds +\int g(t)dt = \int f(s)ds +\int g(s)ds=\int (f(s)+g(s))ds

is a standard result and one you use all the time whether you realize it or not.
 
Last edited:
When I look at it as you wrote it it feels pretty obvious, thanks. I guess the whole part of defining s=1-t threw me off.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top