How Does the Turkish Bow Calculate Maximum Arrow Range?

AI Thread Summary
The Turkish bow from the 15th and 16th centuries demonstrates superior performance compared to Western bows, with its draw force modeled by an elliptical equation. The work done by the bow in accelerating the arrow was calculated, leading to an initial velocity of 69.88 m/s and a maximum range of 497.81 m. However, the correct formula for maximum range is derived as R = (π * Fmax * d) / (2 * m * g), which yields a theoretical range of 1188 m. The discrepancy in calculations suggests an error in the initial expression for draw force. Understanding the derivation of the correct range formula is essential for accurate results.
GreenLRan
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
the turkish bow of the 15th and 16th centuries greatly outperformed western bows. the draw force F(x) of the turkish bow versus the bowstring displacement x (for x negative) is approximately represented by a quadrant of the ellipse (F(x)/Fmax)^2+((x+d)/d)^2=1 . Calculate the work done by the bow in accelerating the arrow, taking Fmax=360N , d=.7m and arrow mass m= 34g. assuming that all of the work ends up as arrow kinetic energy, determine the maximum range R of the arrow. (the actual range is about 430m) Compare with the range for a bow that acts like a simple spring force with the same Fmax and d.

First I started by getting the draw force F(x) in terms of x.
F(x)=-Fmax(x^2+2xd)+1
then I did the integral of that function with respect to x from -.7 to 0 to get the work. And then i set the work equal to kinetic energy and solved for v0. I got v0 = 69.88m/s. giving R=v0^2/g=497.81m

The answer in the back of the book is
R=v0^2/g=(pi*Fmax*d)/(2*m*g)=1188m
and the turkish bow is larger by a factor of pi/2

I would like to know what I'm doing wrong, and how they derived that
R=v0^2/g=(pi*Fmax*d)/(2*m*g). Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(F(x)/Fmax)^2+((x+d)/d)^2=1

Multiply both sides by Fmax^2

F(x)^2+Fmax^2((x+d)/d)^2=Fmax^2

F(x)^2=Fmax^2(1-[(x+d)/d]^2)

sqrt of both sides, F(x)=Fmax*sqrt((1-[(x+d)/d]^2))

looks like you got your expression for F(x) wrong, but it's like 3:15 at night here and I might be wrong, but yours seems too simple
 
haha, awsome, that worked. I guess i should have triple checked it before posting. Well anyway how do they get R=(pi*Fmax*d)/(2*m*g)?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top