B How does the Universe's expansion relate to Newton's 1st law

AI Thread Summary
The expansion of the universe does not relate to Newton's first law, as this law is not applicable to the dynamics of spacetime. Instead, General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics provide the framework for understanding the universe's behavior, particularly during its early stages. In GR, point particles follow geodesics, which are the straightest paths in spacetime, while the expansion of space itself is governed by Einstein's equations. Therefore, the expansion is not due to a force in the traditional sense, as gravity is. Ultimately, Newton's first law does not apply to the context of cosmic expansion.
Pjpic
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
How does the universe's expansion relate to Newton's 1st law.

In other words, is all the expansion due to an unknown cause at the big bang and the 4 forces now act on it? Or maybe is the expansion not really due to a force (as is gravity) so the 1st law doesn't apply?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Pjpic said:
How does the universe's expansion relate to Newton's 1st law.

In other words, is all the expansion due to an unknown cause at the big bang and the 4 forces now act on it? Or maybe is the expansion not really due to a force (as is gravity) so the 1st law doesn't apply?
It really doesn't apply. General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are both important for understanding the behavior of the very early universe, neither of which were conceived of when Newton wrote that law.
 
Hi,

Newtons 1st law is in GR replaced by the 'law' that point particles follow geodesics, the straighest possible paths in spacetime. However, this is a statement about stuff in spacetime, not about spacetime itself. Spacetime itself obeys in GR the Einstein equations. The expansion of space is perfectly described by these Einstein equations.

So, short answer: it does not.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top