How Does the Wave Function Determine Particle Location Probability?

madmike159
Gold Member
Messages
369
Reaction score
0
I was reading part of a book which was explaining about the probability of finding a particle on a 1d line.
\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}P(x) dx = 1
This sounds right because if the line was infinitely long then the particle must be on it.
You can them intergrate between a and b to find the probability of it being in a length and if a and b were the same the probability would be 0.
But when you intergrate P(x) dx you get \frac{Px^{2}}{2}
by putting the numbers in you get P\infty - -P\infty
or P\infty + P\infty = P\infty
A probability can't be more than 1. I must be missing something or dealing with the infinities in the wrong way.
(Sorry it looks like P^infinity its P x infinity but I couldn't change it.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\int_\infty^\infty P(x) dx=1 doesn't mean \int_\infty^\infty Px dx=1 P(x) means the probability in function of x not P a constant times x.
 
madmike159 said:
But when you intergrate P(x) dx you get \frac{Px^{2}}{2}

?

If you integrate P(x) dx you get the integral of P(x); I am not quite sure why you think you would get \frac{Px^{2}}{2}?
P(x) is a FUNCTION, not a constant; there is no way to integrate it unless you know what that function is.
 
Oh so P(x) is the wave function? I'm going to read the chapter again.
 
No, P(x) is the probability function, which is the wavefunction squared (actually, absolute value squared)... So P(x)dx gives the probability for finding the particle on a bit of length dx at position x.
 
Yea, I re-read it and think I understand now. W(x) is the wave function and P(x) =|W(x)^2
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top