How Does the Wave Function Determine Particle Location Probability?

madmike159
Gold Member
Messages
369
Reaction score
0
I was reading part of a book which was explaining about the probability of finding a particle on a 1d line.
\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}P(x) dx = 1
This sounds right because if the line was infinitely long then the particle must be on it.
You can them intergrate between a and b to find the probability of it being in a length and if a and b were the same the probability would be 0.
But when you intergrate P(x) dx you get \frac{Px^{2}}{2}
by putting the numbers in you get P\infty - -P\infty
or P\infty + P\infty = P\infty
A probability can't be more than 1. I must be missing something or dealing with the infinities in the wrong way.
(Sorry it looks like P^infinity its P x infinity but I couldn't change it.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\int_\infty^\infty P(x) dx=1 doesn't mean \int_\infty^\infty Px dx=1 P(x) means the probability in function of x not P a constant times x.
 
madmike159 said:
But when you intergrate P(x) dx you get \frac{Px^{2}}{2}

?

If you integrate P(x) dx you get the integral of P(x); I am not quite sure why you think you would get \frac{Px^{2}}{2}?
P(x) is a FUNCTION, not a constant; there is no way to integrate it unless you know what that function is.
 
Oh so P(x) is the wave function? I'm going to read the chapter again.
 
No, P(x) is the probability function, which is the wavefunction squared (actually, absolute value squared)... So P(x)dx gives the probability for finding the particle on a bit of length dx at position x.
 
Yea, I re-read it and think I understand now. W(x) is the wave function and P(x) =|W(x)^2
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top