How Does Time Shifting Convert a WSCS Process to a WSS Process?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MajorGrubert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Process
MajorGrubert
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody

I have a bit of a problem with understanding the conversion from a WSCS process X(t) to a WSS process Y(t) = X(t - \Delta). With \Delta the time shift being a uniform random variable on (0,T), independent of X(t) and T being the period of the mean function of X(t)

The problem begins with the method to find the mean function of Y(t) :

m_{Y} = E\{X(t - \Delta)\} = E\{E[X(t - \Delta)|\Delta]\} = E\{m_{X}(t - \Delta)\}

First, and it might seem very basic, I don't get the syntax E[X(t - \Delta)|\Delta]

And second, why by averaging the mean of the WSCS process over its period T would we get the mean function of the WSS process ?

If I understand that I could understand the same kind of process used to find the autocorrelation function of Y(t) from the autocorrelation function of X(t)

Please help me !
 
Physics news on Phys.org


On this forum, the LaTex will appear more gracefully if you use the "itex" tag when you want the expression to appear inline with the text.

Code:
the conversion from a WSCS process [itex] X(t) [/itex] to a WSS process [itex] Y(t) = X(t - \Delta) [/itex].

the conversion from a WSCS process X(t) to a WSS process Y(t) = X(t - \Delta).

I don't get the syntax E[X(t - \Delta)|\Delta]

On my screen the square brackets are hard to distinguish from the vertical bars. My interpretation is that it is a "conditional expectation". Roughly speaking, compute the expected value of X(t - \Delta) for one particular value of \Delta.

So:

E( E\{X(t-\Delta)| \Delta\}) = \int_{y=0}^{y=T} \bigg( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} (x) p(X(t-y)=x)| \Delta=y) dx \bigg) p(\Delta=y) dy
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top