How does ultrasonic oscillation reduce sliding friction?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Ultrasonic oscillation significantly reduces sliding friction during cutting processes, particularly in applications like apple slicing. The friction coefficient is simplified to μ ≅ 2/π (ζ), where ζ represents the ratio of moving velocity to vibrational velocity. Lower ratios result in reduced friction, as the rapid vibrations prevent the transition to static friction, which is typically higher than dynamic friction. The phenomenon is further explained by the cocoon effect created by high-frequency vibrations, which disrupt air molecules and minimize product sticking.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of friction coefficients, specifically static and dynamic friction
  • Familiarity with ultrasonic cutting technology
  • Basic knowledge of oscillation principles and their effects on material properties
  • Awareness of the role of air and lubrication in cutting processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of ultrasonic cutting technology and its applications
  • Study the physics of static versus dynamic friction in detail
  • Explore the effects of oscillation modes on cutting efficiency and material interaction
  • Investigate the role of air and lubrication in reducing friction during cutting
USEFUL FOR

Food science students, mechanical engineers, and professionals involved in cutting technology and material science will benefit from this discussion.

foodstarch87
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

Sorry if I'm not able to work through this problem very much myself... I'm a Food Science student, and I'm trying to read an article about ultrasonic cutting when applied to apple slicing. From the papers they reference, the rapid vibrations on the blade reduce the friction coefficient significantly, but I can't understand why that is the case.

In the end, the friction coefficient is simplified down to μ ≅ 2/π (ζ)
where ζ = (moving velcocity) / (vibrational velocity)

The lower the ratio of the blade velocity to the vibrational velocity, the lower the frictional coefficient. I can't really follow the actual derivation very well, since I've only dealt with friction at the most basic level (like mostly up to F = μN...).

Any help with deconstructing the steps in the article would be highly appreciated! I'll try my best to follow and work through it too! Mostly looking for a basic explanation for what's going on. It just doesn't make intuitive sense to me.

Thanks!
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Um, Static friction vs Dynamic friction ??

FWIW, I used related technique to move our massive steel lab-benches. Took 'Three Large Guys' or just skinny me. Trick was to use the bench frame's slight flexibility. I'd pull a bench, then kick the nearest leg to start it. The bench would wriggle, its legs became pendulums, and I'd 'walk' it along the aisle without further ado...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foodstarch87
Sorry if this is a dumb question. Are you suggesting that when it vibrates so fast, it is more of a dynamic friction coefficient in the instantaneous moment? The blade is always moving downward when cutting, but the oscillation seems to somehow affect the friction coefficient. Not super well versed in this haha
 
foodstarch87 said:
Are you suggesting that when it vibrates so fast, it is more of a dynamic friction coefficient in the instantaneous moment?

I can't speak for @Nik_2213 , but yes, the vibrations do not let the friction go into the static range, which with very few exceptions is higher than the dynamic friction.

It is much harder in most cases to start two surfaces moving against each rather than keeping them moving.

There are other things in play at speed: entrained air/gas, possibly vaporizing lube, lubricant viscosity changes due to pressure/temp, surface heating...others...

I believe though, you are looking at a well documented special case static versus dynamic friction experiment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foodstarch87
Hi everyone,

I was digging around more and saw this explanation on the data sheet of the ultrasonic blade manufacturer. It said that "Because the horn (the blade) is vibrating at such a high frequency, it disrupts the air molecules around it causing a cocoon effect. This cocoon effect virtually eliminates product sticking". Does this sound plausible? How would I describe that as a physics phenomenon?
 

Attachments

The mode of oscillation will determine the principle being employed to cut.

1. Simple vertical oscillation, is chopping. It replaces static friction with dynamic friction, may introduce a cocoon of air.

2. Oscillation along the length of the blade, is slicing. It will convert static to dynamic friction, but introduces less air.

3. Sideways oscillation, opening the kerf and introducing air. It will be messy.

The slots in the cutter look to me like they are there to encourage the vertical oscillation mode
The cutting quality may be because the knife remains clean which reduces sticking.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foodstarch87
It may or may not be the primary effect, but pulling or pushing a knife longitudinally as it advances into a cut has a useful result. The frictional force of the material on the flat of the knife has a more or less fixed magnitude. That friction acts opposite to the direction of relative motion. If the knife is moving primarily longitudinally, this dynamic friction acts primarily longitudinally. The component of friction that then acts to oppose the knife advancing into the cut is reduced.

Vibration has an advantage over long strokes because it eliminates the need to support the material against the longitudinal force of friction. The material's own inertia does the job.

A vertical vibration into and out of the cut would have much the same effect. The time average of the momentarily upward and momentarily downward forces of friction can average out to something pretty small, even though the net movement averages downward.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foodstarch87

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K