How does vacuum polarization conserve energy?

bolognie1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So just to clear things up before we start, does vacuum polarization occur randomly, or does it just occur when an electromagnetic field is present?
Also, how would vacuum polarization conserve energy - does it take energy from the field or does it emit negative energy gravity waves or something?
Also, in the process of Hawking radiation, what actually happens? Does it absorb an antiparticle and emit the other, or does it absorb one of the photons emitted after annihilation?
Cheers guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bolognie1 said:
So just to clear things up before we start, does vacuum polarization occur randomly, or does it just occur when an electromagnetic field is present?
The electromagnetic field is always present, but its field strength can be zero.
bolognie1 said:
Also, how would vacuum polarization conserve energy - does it take energy from the field or does it emit negative energy gravity waves or something?
How do you get energy out of it? If you are thinking of the Casimir effect: the energy has been in the finite separation of the objects all the time.
bolognie1 said:
Also, in the process of Hawking radiation, what actually happens? Does it absorb an antiparticle and emit the other, or does it absorb one of the photons emitted after annihilation?
Quantum mechanics happens. Popular descriptions are not what actually happens, but equations are hard to present to the public. "A particle escapes" is probably the best simplified description. No pairs involved.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top