How Does Vertex Degree Range Affect Edge Count in a Graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpatialVacancy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
In a graph G with v vertices and e edges, where each vertex has a degree between d_min and d_max, the relationship between edge count and vertex degree is established. Using the Handshaking Lemma, which states that the sum of vertex degrees equals twice the number of edges, it is shown that the total degree must lie between d_min multiplied by v and d_max multiplied by v. This leads to the conclusion that e must be bounded by 1/2 times d_min times v and 1/2 times d_max times v. The proof confirms that the number of edges e is constrained by these inequalities. This understanding is crucial for analyzing graph structures based on vertex degree ranges.
SpatialVacancy
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Help me with a proof!

Suppose that G is a graph with v vertices and e edges and that the degree of each vertex is at least d_{min} and at most d_{max}. Show that:



\dfrac{1}{2}d_{min}\ \cdot\ v \ \leq \ e \ \leq \ \dfrac{1}{2}d_{max}\ \cdot\ v


I don't have an idea of where to start on this problem. Thank you for your help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Every edge connects 2 vertices. Suppose every edge had degree exactly dmin. How many edges would there be?
 


Sure, I'd be happy to help you with this proof! Let's start by defining some terms to make things clearer. The degree of a vertex in a graph is the number of edges that are incident to that vertex. So for this problem, we have a graph G with v vertices and e edges, and the degree of each vertex is at least d_{min} and at most d_{max}.

To prove this statement, we will use the Handshaking Lemma, which states that the sum of the degrees of all vertices in a graph is equal to twice the number of edges. In other words,

\sum_{v \in V} deg(v) = 2e

where V is the set of all vertices in the graph.

Now, let's consider the minimum and maximum degrees of the vertices in G. We know that the degree of each vertex is at least d_{min} and at most d_{max}, so we can write the following inequalities:

d_{min} \leq deg(v) \leq d_{max}

for all vertices v in G. Multiplying both sides by v and summing over all vertices in G, we get:

\sum_{v \in V} d_{min} \leq \sum_{v \in V} deg(v) \leq \sum_{v \in V} d_{max}

Using the Handshaking Lemma, we can rewrite the left and right sides as:

d_{min}v \leq 2e \leq d_{max}v

Finally, dividing both sides by 2, we get the desired result:

\dfrac{1}{2}d_{min}\ \cdot\ v \ \leq \ e \ \leq \ \dfrac{1}{2}d_{max}\ \cdot\ v

Therefore, we have proven that the number of edges e in G must be between \dfrac{1}{2}d_{min}\ \cdot\ v and \dfrac{1}{2}d_{max}\ \cdot\ v, as desired. I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions or if you need further clarification.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top