How Does Viscosity Affect Motion in a Fluid?

AI Thread Summary
Viscosity affects the motion of a mass falling through a liquid by introducing a retarding force that opposes gravity. The discussion revolves around solving the differential equations for speed, acceleration, and distance fallen at a specific time. Two approaches are considered for finding the solution, with emphasis on correctly applying initial conditions to determine constants. The importance of using the integrating factor method is highlighted for solving the resulting equations. Ultimately, the correct application of initial conditions leads to a complete relationship for velocity over time, allowing for the calculation of acceleration and displacement.
dykuma
Messages
55
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A mass M falls under gravity (force mg) through a liquid with decreasing viscosity so that the retarding force is -2mv/(1+t). If it starts from rest, what is the speed, acceleration, and distance fallen at time t=1.

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


F = 2mv/(1+t) - mg
F = m[- g + 2v/(1+t)]
ma = m[-g + 2v/(1+t)]
a = -g + 2v/(1+ t)

At this point, I see two paths to a solution, and I don't know which is correct.
I can let a=x'', v=x'
x'' - (2/(1+ t)) x' = -g
where the solution according to mathmatica is (I'm not sure how to solve this exactly, my guess is to use frobenius)
x =1/3 - C1 T^3 + 1/2(2 C1 + g) T^2 + g T + C1 T + C2

or I can let
a=v'
v' = -g + 2v/(1+ t)
v' - 2v/(1+ t)= -g
Where the solution would be
v = (1 + t) (C1 t + C1 + g) - Edit (I see this solution might be wrong, checking now)

I'm not sure which is the correct result, and I am concerned about the units on each,
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dykuma said:
a=v'
v' = -g + 2v/(1+ t)
I would prefer this.
But I think the equation should be
F=mg-2v/(1+t).
Negative sign of the retarding force indicates that it is directed opposite to the gravity.
 
cnh1995 said:
I would prefer this.
But I think the equation should be
F=mg-2v/(1+t).
Negative sign of the retarding force indicates that it is directed opposite to the gravity.
I see, I was thinking in terms of gravity pulling down, retarding force pushing up.
 
Okay, flipping the signs around I get the following:
a = g - 2v/(1+ t)
let a=v'
v' = g - 2v/(1+ t)
v' + 2v/(1+ t) = g
upload_2016-10-31_13-14-51.png

Does this look correct? And what should I do with this constant C?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-10-31_13-14-21.png
    upload_2016-10-31_13-14-21.png
    648 bytes · Views: 434
dykuma said:
I see, I was thinking in terms of gravity pulling down, retarding force pushing up.
I think that won't make any difference as long as both the forces are directed opposite to each other.
 
dykuma said:
v' + 2v/(1+ t) = g
I believe this could be solved using the integrating factor method.
If dy/dx+Py=Q, the integrating factor I=e∫Pdx. Look up this method.
 
cnh1995 said:
I believe this could be solved using the integrating factor method.
If dy/dx+Py=Q, the integrating factor I=e∫Pdx. Look up this method.
I did that, and I got a solution that matched the more complicated case of us x''=a, x'=v.
upload_2016-10-31_13-42-14.png


The problem now Is that I am unsure of what to do with those constants.
 
dykuma said:
I did that, and I got a solution that matched the more complicated case of us x''=a, x'=v.
View attachment 108277

The problem now Is that I am unsure of what to do with those constants.
First find the solution for v as a function of time. Here, you will have only one constant. Use the initial condition i.e. v=0 at t=0 to get this constant. So you'll have a complete v vs t relationship. Now differentiate it w.r.t time and put t=1 to get the acceleration at t=1 and integrate v(t) w.r.t time from t=0 to t=1 to get the displacement. I don't think you need three constants for this.
 
cnh1995 said:
First find the solution for v as a function of time. Here, you will have only one constant. Use the initial condition i.e. v=0 at t=0 to get this constant. So you'll have a complete v vs t relationship. Now differentiate it w.r.t time and put t=1 to get the acceleration at t=1 and integrate v(t) w.r.t time from t=0 to t=1 to get the displacement. I don't think you need three constants for this.

Oh my god, I'm such and Idiot. I don't know why I didn't see that before!

Thanks!
 
Back
Top