How Does Weight and Thrust Affect Rocket Acceleration and Velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Labguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thrust
AI Thread Summary
Weight and thrust significantly impact rocket acceleration and velocity. The fundamental principle is that with a constant force, decreasing mass increases acceleration, meaning rockets with lighter payloads will accelerate faster. Thrust-to-weight ratio must exceed one for a rocket to lift off, and higher ratios are preferable for reaching orbit quickly. Additionally, factors such as thruster heat tolerance and structural stress during acceleration are critical engineering considerations. Overall, variations in weight and thrust lead to different acceleration rates and orbital capabilities for rockets.
Labguy
Science Advisor
Messages
731
Reaction score
7
Don't laugh guys, but I'm familiar with a lot of general astronomy stuff but my question will seem very stupid.,:cry: About rockets, etc.

I was thinking today (dangerous) and realized I don't know the answer to:
Samples: (hypothetical)

1. Space shuttle and all weighs 5 million pounds and total thrust of engines is 6 million pounds, net one million pounds over weight.

2. Payload (any) weighs 500 pounds and thrust in 1,000,500 pounds, net one million pounds over weight.

3. Payload weighs 5 pounds and thrust in 1,000,005 pounds, net one million pounds over weight.

So, not counting air-drag, etc.
Do all three accelerate at the same rate:confused:
Do all three reach same velocity in the same amount of time:confused:
Would all three reach the same orbit (if programmed the same) at the same time and velocity/altitude:confused:

Like I said, dumb question, after midnight, drunk, and I have to pilot an America West flight in 5 hours...:zzz:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, of course they don't accelerate at the same rate.

F = ma

If you keep the force constant, but decrease mass, you necessarily also increase acceleration.

- Warren

p.s. I hope you're aware of FAA restrictions about alcohol consumption before flying. I wasn't even aware that you were a pilot? :rolleyes:
 
Thrust to weight ratio is a common theme in avionics. Obviously it must be greater than 1 just to get off the ground. For the purpose of getting a payload into orbit, the bigger the better. Getting out of the Earth's gravity well as soon as possible is the objective. One of the more important limiting factors is how much heat the thrusters can tolerate [and how long]. Acceleration stress, which is a form of hoop stress in structural design, is also an issue. It is a complex engineering problem.
 
chroot said:
No, of course they don't accelerate at the same rate.

F = ma

If you keep the force constant, but decrease mass, you necessarily also increase acceleration.

- Warren

p.s. I hope you're aware of FAA restrictions about alcohol consumption before flying. I wasn't even aware that you were a pilot? :rolleyes:
That was easy, I said it was a midnight, drunken-stupor question! Now I'm up early too. I gotta see the doctor for more sleeping pills.

FAA? You mean I'm supposed to follow those rules too? I guess they actually expect me to get a pilot's license too!...:biggrin:
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top