How exactly does friction/external forces affect the momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HoneyPancake
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Friction and external forces, such as air resistance and gravity, decrease the momentum of objects by affecting their velocity. While momentum is conserved in closed systems, real-life scenarios often involve these external forces, leading to slight discrepancies in momentum measurements. In inelastic collisions, kinetic energy is lost as it transforms into other forms like heat and sound, but momentum remains conserved due to Newton's third law. Experimental errors in momentum measurements can arise from factors like table levelness, air resistance, and neglecting rotational motion. Understanding these concepts clarifies how external forces influence momentum in practical situations.
HoneyPancake
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How exactly do friction forces and other external forces change (mostly decrease) the momentum of an object?

We know that the conservation of momentum theory only applies to closed systems with no external forces, yet in real life, there always is external forces that must surely affect the momentum. How do exactly do they affect it?

(I know that friction does work on the object, and therefore decreases the kinetic energy. H/o, shouldn't this not change the momentum? For ex., in inelastic collisions, kinetic energy is lost yet momentum is still conserved...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
External forces just push things around and make them go faster or slower, which changes their momentum. But I think this isn't what you were asking. Can you elaborate?
 
I can see that friction forces affect objects' velocity, which I suppose, should affect there momentum. However, I'm confused as to why in an inelastic collisions, the objects lose kinetic energy (and therefore velocity, right?) and yet still conserve momentum?

To elaborate further, our physics teacher had us do a lab where we collided two balls together and "measured" the momentum to test out the conservation of momentum theory. The initial momentum was close to the final momentum, of course, however, there was still some slight errors. Besides human error, what else could have caused this slight loss of momentum?
 
HoneyPancake said:
I can see that friction forces affect objects' velocity, which I suppose, should affect there momentum. However, I'm confused as to why in an inelastic collisions, the objects lose kinetic energy (and therefore velocity, right?) and yet still conserve momentum?

The conservation of momentum is a direct consequence of Newton's third law. Here's a simplified proof:

m_a applies a force on m_b and m_b applies a force on m_a. m_a accelerates at F/m_a; m_b accelerates at F/m_b in the other direction. After a while, v_a=F/m_a*t and v_b=F/m_b*t. m_a*v_a=F*t and m_b*v_b=F*t, so m_a*v_a = m_b*v_b. That's the conservation of momentum.

Kinetic energy is not conserved because the energy is turned into things like heat and sound.

To elaborate further, our physics teacher had us do a lab where we collided two balls together and "measured" the momentum to test out the conservation of momentum theory. The initial momentum was close to the final momentum, of course, however, there was still some slight errors. Besides human error, what else could have caused this slight loss of momentum?

External forces: gravity (if the table wasn't perfectly level), air resistance, rolling friction, etc. If you just measured mv and said that was the momentum, you would have neglected the balls' rotational motion, which is another source of error.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top