How far up the hill will it coast before starting to roll back down?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spartan55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill Roll
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a car traveling up a slope and determining how far it will coast before rolling back down. The subject area includes kinematics and energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use kinematic equations to find the distance the car travels up the slope, raising questions about the validity of their calculated distance. Some participants suggest exploring an energy conservation approach as an alternative method.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to validate the original poster's calculations, with one participant expressing confidence in the answer. Another participant introduces an energy-based perspective, indicating a productive exploration of different methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's class has not yet covered energy methods, focusing instead on basic kinematics.

spartan55
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car traveling at 22.0 m/s runs out of gas while traveling up a 24.0deg slope. How far up the hill will it coast before starting to roll back down?


Homework Equations


(v_final)^2 = (v_initial)^2 + 2*(a_parallel)*(x_final - x_initial)
...and some trig

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the acceleration that is important is the acceleration parallel to the plane which is found by some trig manipulation:
(a_y)sin(24.0deg) = a_parallel, where (a_y) = -9.8 m/s^2.
Thus: a_parallel = -3.986 m/s^2.
Now would I use (v_initial) = 22.0 m/s and plug this with a_parallel, x_initial = 0, and v_final = 0 m/s into the above kinematic equation to get: 60.712 m ?
For some reason this just seems like too big of an answer. Any help appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That answer looks good to me!
It is interesting to check it with an energy approach. KE at the bottom equals PE at the top so
mgh = .5*mv²
Solve for h, then convert that to a distance along the slope using trigonometry.
 
Wow it is a lot easier with the energy approach. We haven't talked about that yet, we're still on basic kinematics. Thanks for your help!
 
Most welcome!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K