How Fast Was the Car Going When It Hit My Dog?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidBabineau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Figure Speed
AI Thread Summary
A dog named Zeta was struck by a 1999 Corvette Z06, resulting in severe injuries and internal bleeding. The incident occurred on a road with a 25mph speed limit, and witnesses claim the driver was speeding. A police report was filed, but the responding officer was not helpful in determining the driver's speed. Calculations suggest that if Zeta was launched at a 45-degree angle, her initial speed could be around 28.8mph. The owner is seeking assistance in proving the driver's speed to hold them accountable for the accident.
DavidBabineau
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Im sorry to ask anyone this,but our dog Zeta was hitbye a car today and she is like our child. The car was a 1999 corvette Z06 and our dog weighed 85lbs. she was thrown in the air and landed 110 feet. I saw the whole thing which was the worst thing i could of ever seen. she has internal bleeding and is at the animal hospital. the speed limit on the road was 25mph. I know the guy was speeding, I just can't prove it.Can anyone help me please?I'm trying to find out how fast was he going?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DavidBabineau said:
Im sorry to ask anyone this,but our dog Zeta was hitbye a car today and she is like our child. The car was a 1999 corvette Z06 and our dog weighed 85lbs. she was thrown in the air and landed 110 feet. I saw the whole thing which was the worst thing i could of ever seen. she has internal bleeding and is at the animal hospital. the speed limit on the road was 25mph. I know the guy was speeding, I just can't prove it.Can anyone help me please?I'm trying to find out how fast was he going?

Welcome to the PF, and sorry to hear about your dog being injured.

Was a police report taken? Have you been contacted by the car owner? In most states that I know of, the dog owner is generally considered at fault when the dog is involved in an accident (sorry). If the driver were driving recklessly, that might change it (I don't know), but the police officer who wrote up the report should be able to give you that basic information.
 
yYes we called the police but he was not very helpful.We did a report and we have witness's saying the young man was driving very fast, but i was wondering if you could figure out how fast he was going bye the weight of the dog and the distance the dog traveled which is 110 ft? the car weigh's aprox 3000 lbs. i could be wrong though?
 
DavidBabineau said:
yYes we called the police but he was not very helpful.We did a report and we have witness's saying the young man was driving very fast, but i was wondering if you could figure out how fast he was going bye the weight of the dog and the distance the dog traveled which is 110 ft? the car weigh's aprox 3000 lbs. i could be wrong though?

With a quick calculation, I get approximately 28.8mph for the initial horizontal speed of the dog if he was launched at a 45 degree angle. I'll re-check my numbers, and post again if I find an error.

Again, I'm sorry for your dog's injuries.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top