How Fast Was the Police Car Going When It Was 27 Meters Behind Again?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohabitar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a scenario where a police car accelerates from rest to catch a speeding car traveling at a constant speed of 24 m/sec. The key confusion arises from the phrase "27 meters behind for the second time," as participants debate the implications of the police car's acceleration versus the constant speed of the speeder. It is clarified that the police car can indeed be 27 meters behind the speeder twice: once as the gap opens and again before it catches up. The calculations using kinematic equations are discussed, emphasizing the need to consider relative speeds when determining the police car's speed at those distances. Ultimately, the problem illustrates the dynamics of pursuit and the importance of understanding relative motion in physics.
mohabitar
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
A car is speed at a constant 24 m/sec in a school zone. A police car starts from rest just as the speeder passes it and accelerates at a constant rate of 5.4 m/sec2.

Also, the cop catches the car at t=8.89 s and v=48.

How fast is the police car going when it is 27 m behind the speeding car for the second time?

So, I'm not sure if the wording here is what's confusing me, but I can't get the right answer. First of all, how can the cop car ever be behind the speeding car "for the second time"? If the car is at a constant velocity and the police car keeps accelerating, then once they meet for the first time, the cop car will always be ahead, so what does it mean for it to be behind the speeding car for the second time?

I attempted the problem using basic kinematic equations to try to first find when it is 27 m behind the car: v=48+5.4t and 27=0+48t+.5(5.4)t^2. And so I solved for t and plugged it into the first equation but that didn't get me the right answer. Maybe I'm just not understanding the problem..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mohabitar said:
A car is speed at a constant 24 m/sec in a school zone. A police car starts from rest just as the speeder passes it and accelerates at a constant rate of 5.4 m/sec2.

Also, the cop catches the car at t=8.89 s and v=48.

How fast is the police car going when it is 27 m behind the speeding car for the second time?

So, I'm not sure if the wording here is what's confusing me, but I can't get the right answer. First of all, how can the cop car ever be behind the speeding car "for the second time"? If the car is at a constant velocity and the police car keeps accelerating, then once they meet for the first time, the cop car will always be ahead, so what does it mean for it to be behind the speeding car for the second time?

I attempted the problem using basic kinematic equations to try to first find when it is 27 m behind the car: v=48+5.4t and 27=0+48t+.5(5.4)t^2. And so I solved for t and plugged it into the first equation but that didn't get me the right answer. Maybe I'm just not understanding the problem..

The "second time" part seems weird to me.Did you try to find the speed of the police car when is 27m behind the first car. Is that the good answer? Also if you do it your way and calculate the the speed of the police car when is 27m in front of the car. You must account for the velocity of the first car in 27=0+48t+.5(5.4)t^2..V= 48m/s is the speed of the police car with respect to the starting point but you need V relative to the first car.You can then convert again to the rest frame speed.
 
mohabitar said:
A car is speed at a constant 24 m/sec in a school zone. A police car starts from rest just as the speeder passes it and accelerates at a constant rate of 5.4 m/sec2.

Also, the cop catches the car at t=8.89 s and v=48.

How fast is the police car going when it is 27 m behind the speeding car for the second time?

So, I'm not sure if the wording here is what's confusing me, but I can't get the right answer. First of all, how can the cop car ever be behind the speeding car "for the second time"? If the car is at a constant velocity and the police car keeps accelerating, then once they meet for the first time, the cop car will always be ahead, so what does it mean for it to be behind the speeding car for the second time?

I attempted the problem using basic kinematic equations to try to first find when it is 27 m behind the car: v=48+5.4t and 27=0+48t+.5(5.4)t^2. And so I solved for t and plugged it into the first equation but that didn't get me the right answer. Maybe I'm just not understanding the problem..

AT time t = 0, the cop car was level the speeding car. A very short time later the cop car will have been 1m behind the speeding car [with the speeding car opening the gap quite rapidly].

When the cop car caught the speeding motorist, they were again level with each other, naturally.
Just before he caught the speeding car, the cop car will have been 1 m behind .

That is the second time he was 1m behind the speeding car!

Presumably during this pursuit, the maximum gap from cop car to speeding motorist was more than 27m.
That means the gap first open to 27m [the first time the cop car was 27m behind the speedster]. The gap then continued to open to the maximum gap, the cop car then began to close the gap, and at some point the gap was reduced to 27m [the second time the cop car was 27m behind the speedster]. The cop car continued to close the gap and eventually caught the speedster.
That's how it works.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top