# How hard of a Hit force does it take to make a mass jump?

• I
• MIKES279
In summary: What you are asking for is impossible to find.In summary, if you hit a steel rod or ball with an upward force, it will jump up. However, the amount the object will jump up depends on the speed of the object, the mass of the object, and the direction of the force.
MIKES279
I am looking for a formula that I can use to find out how high a steel rod or ball will jump up.
If I hit mass M with force F how high will it jump up. If there is a program that would be great.
every thing will be in pounds
So if ball or rod of 10 lbs is hit on the bottem with 14 lbs of force how high will it go up.
These are NOT THE NUMBERS they just to give you an idea of what I am looking for.

What research have you done? What have you found so far?

topsquark
MIKES279 said:
I am looking for a formula that I can use to find out how high a steel rod or ball will jump up.
If I hit mass M with force F how high will it jump up. If there is a program that would be great.
every thing will be in pounds
So if ball or rod of 10 lbs is hit on the bottem with 14 lbs of force how high will it go up.
These are NOT THE NUMBERS they just to give you an idea of what I am looking for.
A single number for force does not tell you much about a collision.

Is that a number for peak force? Or average force? Averaged over what interval? Averaged over time?

For a collision, one would normally want to know the mass of your hammer, the mass of your target, the speed of your hammer and the elasticity of the collision. "Force" would not be an important value. This is just as well, since "Force" is more difficult to predict, measure or control than those other things.

topsquark and Ibix
MIKES279 said:
I am looking for a formula that I can use to find out how high a steel rod or ball will jump up.
If I hit mass M with force F how high will it jump up. If there is a program that would be great.
The direction of the force, the relative velocities, the shape of the coliding bodies, as well as the nature of the surface is important to know.

Hitting the rod sideways with a wood block over a flat wood surface is very different than applying a force vertically with a falling foam block over mud.

jbriggs444
phinds said:
What research have you done? What have you found so far?
I want to get some numbers before I make a test unit.

jbriggs444 said:
A single number for force does not tell you much about a collision.

Is that a number for peak force? Or average force? Averaged over what interval? Averaged over time?

For a collision, one would normally want to know the mass of your hammer, the mass of your target, the speed of your hammer and the elasticity of the collision. "Force" would not be an important value. This is just as well, since "Force" is more difficult to predict, measure or control than those other things.
it will be peak time 100th of a sec or so.

phinds said:
What research have you done? What have you found so far?

MIKES279 said:
I want to get some numbers before I make a test unit.
Sounds like you don't understand the difference between research and experiments. I didn't ask anything about experiments.

jbriggs444 said:
A single number for force does not tell you much about a collision.

Is that a number for peak force? Or average force? Averaged over what interval? Averaged over time?

For a collision, one would normally want to know the mass of your hammer, the mass of your target, the speed of your hammer and the elasticity of the collision. "Force" would not be an important value. This is just as well, since "Force" is more difficult to predict, measure or control than those other things.
I will change all of them to get the high's I am looking for. I want the formula so I can work out what I need and not waste money. That and after all everything needs to be fine tuned.

phinds said:
Sounds like you don't understand the difference between research and experiments. I didn't ask anything about experiments.
This part of the research and none of the books I have deal with this. There was a old dos game with a canonball that did this but that is long ago and far away. LOL

Lnewqban said:
The direction of the force, the relative velocities, the shape of the coliding bodies, as well as the nature of the surface is important to know.

Hitting the rod sideways with a wood block over a flat wood surface is very different than applying a force vertically with a falling foam block over mud.
Steel on steel and it is on rails so up and down. Force and mass will change how high is what matters.

MIKES279 said:
Steel on steel and it is on rails so up and down. Force and mass will change how high is what matters.
Do you know about how high the velocity of the impact wold be?

Lnewqban said:
Do you know about how high the velocity of the impact wold be?
No i will have to change that to make it work 100th of a sec if that helps. It will be fine tuned i realy want the formula to work it out.

MIKES279 said:
No i will have to change that to make it work 100th of a sec if that helps. It will be fine tuned i realy want the formula to work it out.
Where does the 1/100th of a second number come from? It sounds made up.

A steel on steel collision at 1 meter per second lasting 1/100th of a second will have 1/200th of a second of collision and 1/200th of a second of rebound. Assuming constant decelleration, that is an average speed of 1/2 meter per second so about 2.5 millimeters of deformation shared between the two objects.

At 10 meters per second, you'd expect 2.5 centimeters (about one inch) of deformation.

Offhand, that sounds high. But I do not know the scale of your objects.

russ_watters and Lnewqban
MIKES279 said:
I am looking for a formula that I can use to find out how high a steel rod or ball will jump up.
If I hit mass M with force F how high will it jump up. If there is a program that would be great.
every thing will be in pounds
I recommend working in terms of mass, momentum, and kinetic energy, not force and mass. Energy is usually much easier to work with than force. Then you can calculate ideal elastic and/or inelastic collisions to quickly get a rough idea of what you'll be working with.

Lnewqban
MIKES279 said:
No i will have to change that to make it work 100th of a sec if that helps. It will be fine tuned i realy want the formula to work it out.
If I understand the situation correctly, we have a steel ball or rod of mass M that is suspended in mid air and between two vertical rails.
That mass M receives a vertical impact from another mass of steel.

That collision produces a force F acting upwards during a very short period of time.
Inmediately after that, the mass M slides directly upwards between the rails until reaching certain high, which you are trying to find a formula for, and then stops and perhaps falls back down.

Is the above assumption correct?

MIKES279 and jbriggs444
That situation remains me of this fair game:

MIKES279 said:
I was not able to find it and I gave more data now
Find what? Look, it's been explained a bunch of time already that the approach you are trying to take doesn't work. If you want to solve this problem you need to change your approach. We could help you figure this out in minutes if you want. Or you can go additional weeks without getting anywhere. Up to you.

 And also, since you say you want to actually do this.- you can't. There's no easy way to control "impact force". It's just not a useful thing.

Last edited:
Lnewqban said:
If I understand the situation correctly, we have a steel ball or rod of mass M that is suspended in mid air and between two vertical rails.
That mass M receives a vertical impact from another mass of steel.

That collision produces a force F acting upwards during a very short period of time.
Inmediately after that, the mass M slides directly upwards between the rails until reaching certain high, which you are trying to find a formula for, and then stops and perhaps falls back down.

Is the above assumption correct?
Yes just about it.There will be more later.

Lnewqban
MIKES279 said:
Yes just about it.There will be more later.

https://magisterrex.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/blogmousetrap1963.jpg

jbriggs444, phinds and russ_watters
MIKES279 said:
I am looking for a formula that I can use to find out how high a steel rod or ball will jump up.
If I hit mass M with force F how high will it jump up. If there is a program that would be great.
every thing will be in pounds
So if ball or rod of 10 lbs is hit on the bottem with 14 lbs of force how high will it go up.
These are NOT THE NUMBERS they just to give you an idea of what I am looking for.
Ok the rod at point a is moving up at 2.18 feet ^2 at point a how high will it go till it starts to fall back to point a and how long till it starts to fall.

berkeman
MIKES279 said:
Ok the rod at point a is moving up at 2.18 feet ^2 at point a how high will it go till it starts to fall back to point a and how long till it starts to fall.
What does 2.18 square feet mean? That's an area, not a distance, velocity, or acceleration.

berkeman
Drakkith said:
What does 2.18 square feet mean? That's an area, not a distance, velocity, or acceleration.
2.18 feet per sec

MIKES279 said:
2.18 feet per sec
That is velocity.

Lnewqban said:
That is velocity.
yes

MIKES279 said:
yes
If that is the initial velocity, this is a projectile problem, considering zero friction among the rails a guides.

MIKES279 said:
yes
Well thank goodness we got that cleared up!

I didn't read the whole thread, but are you familiar with the Kinematic Equations of Motion for an object that is under the influence of a constant force (the force of gravity down) with no other influences? If you want to calculate the projectile motion of that object given an initial upward velocity, those are the equations you will use. Check out the Wikipedia article for more information...

Lnewqban
Lnewqban said:
If that is the initial velocity, this is a projectile problem, considering zero friction among the rails a guides.

MIKES279 said:
2.18 feet ^2
Guessing that you meant to write that a block is moving upward at 2.18 feet / sec^2, unimpeded by anything other than gravity.

The easy way to approach this from first principles is to start by computing how long it will take for the object to slow to a stop. That result can be obtained by $$t = \frac{v}{a}$$where ##t## is the time it takes, ##v## is the initial upward velocity and ##a## is the downward acceleration of gravity. In units of feet and seconds, the acceleration of gravity is approximately 32.2 feet per second squared.

Since the acceleration is uniform, the average velocity is the mean of the initial velocity and the final velocity. The final velocity is zero, so this simplifies to$$v_\text{avg}=\frac{v}{2}$$where ##v_\text{avg}## is our sought-after average velocity and ##v## is the given 2.18 feet per second^2.

The upward distance travelled will be the product of the two:$$h = v_\text{avg} t = \frac{v}{a} \frac{v}{2} = \frac{v^2}{2a}$$If we use a calculator we can calculate:

Elapsed time: 67 milliseconds.
Average velocity: 1.09 feet per second
Height gained: 0.737 feet = 0.885 inches

Lnewqban
jbriggs444 said:
Guessing that you meant to write that a block is moving upward at 2.18 feet / sec^2, unimpeded by anything other than gravity.

The easy way to approach this from first principles is to start by computing how long it will take for the object to slow to a stop. That result can be obtained by $$t = \frac{v}{a}$$where ##t## is the time it takes, ##v## is the initial upward velocity and ##a## is the downward acceleration of gravity. In units of feet and seconds, the acceleration of gravity is approximately 32.2 feet per second squared.

Since the acceleration is uniform, the average velocity is the mean of the initial velocity and the final velocity. The final velocity is zero, so this simplifies to$$v_\text{avg}=\frac{v}{2}$$where ##v_\text{avg}## is our sought-after average velocity and ##v## is the given 2.18 feet per second^2.

The upward distance travelled will be the product of the two:$$h = v_\text{avg} t = \frac{v}{a} \frac{v}{2} = \frac{v^2}{2a}$$If we use a calculator we can calculate:

Elapsed time: 67 milliseconds.
Average velocity: 1.09 feet per second
Height gained: 0.737 feet = 0.885 inches
thats not in C or C++?

MIKES279 said:
thats not in C or C++?
Ideally, it would be in "number 2 pencil and a sheet of paper". However, all I have handy is this forum software that uses ##\LaTeX## and a Windows calculator.

russ_watters and Lnewqban
MIKES279 said:
thats not in C or C++?
Nothing here needs to be in a computer program. It's all simple formulas that can be done quickly with pen and paper and a calculator. If anything a spreadsheet program like Excel would be just fine if you're looking for some barebones automation. You certainly don't need to go with C or C++ unless you plan on writing a serious program or you're practicing your coding.

## 1. What is the formula for calculating the force of a mass jump?

The formula for calculating the force of a mass jump is F = m * a, where F is the force, m is the mass of the object, and a is the acceleration.

## 2. How does the height of the jump affect the force?

The height of the jump does not directly affect the force. The force of the jump is determined by the mass and acceleration of the object, not the height of the jump.

## 3. Can you explain the concept of impulse in relation to a mass jump?

Impulse is the change in momentum of an object. In a mass jump, the force applied to the object causes a change in its momentum, resulting in a jump. The greater the force, the greater the impulse and the higher the jump.

## 4. Is the force of a mass jump constant or does it vary?

The force of a mass jump can vary depending on the mass and acceleration of the object, as well as external factors such as air resistance. However, if all other variables remain constant, the force of the jump will also remain constant.

## 5. How does the force of a mass jump compare to other forces in nature?

The force of a mass jump can vary greatly depending on the mass and acceleration of the object. In comparison to other forces in nature, it may be relatively small, such as the force of gravity or the force of a person pushing an object. However, in certain circumstances, such as a high jump in sports, the force of a mass jump can be quite significant.

• Mechanics
Replies
21
Views
1K
• Mechanics
Replies
26
Views
5K
• Mechanics
Replies
7
Views
10K
• Mechanics
Replies
9
Views
913
• Mechanics
Replies
16
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
16
Views
4K
• Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
3K
• Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
1K
• Mechanics
Replies
23
Views
2K
• General Engineering
Replies
1
Views
635