How hard would it be to output a stable beam if a certain wavelength?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of generating a stable beam of infrared light at a specific wavelength, initially proposed as 9.25nm, but later clarified to potentially be 9.25mm. Participants explore the implications of these wavelengths in terms of technology, safety, and biological effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about generating infrared light at a wavelength of 9.25nm, questioning the difficulty and methods involved.
  • Another participant suggests that the wavelength might actually be 925nm, which is in the infrared range and could be achievable with a diode, contrasting with the more challenging 9.25nm in the UV range.
  • A third participant mentions using the wavelength to detect glucose in the bloodstream, referencing an article for further context.
  • There is a correction regarding the wavelength being 9.25mm, which is in the microwave regime and suggests that it could be generated with appropriate equipment.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential harm of microwaves to humans due to their interaction with water molecules, prompting further discussion on safety at different power levels.
  • Another participant notes that even low power microwave signals can be dangerous in confined spaces or with high gain antennas, emphasizing the risks associated with high-frequency microwaves.
  • One participant shares their experience with operating equipment at frequencies up to 24GHz, highlighting the risks associated with higher frequencies like 31GHz.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and safety of generating beams at the specified wavelengths, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the implications of using microwaves.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various wavelengths and their associated technologies, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the exact wavelength and its implications for safety and equipment requirements.

Nerdydude101
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I want to output a specific wavelength of infrared light, I believe the wavelength was 9.25nm, how hard would that be and how would I proceed?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Are you sure the wavelength was 9.25nm and not 925nm? The factor of 100 makes difference...
The latter is IR and something you could potentially get from a diode, the former is way up in the UV range and would be very difficult (and potentially dangerous) to generate.
 
I'm trying to find the glucose in the bloodstream, this is the best description I got but other articles say similar things
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2009-02/1235057498.Bc.r.html
 
The article says 9.25 mm...not mm. That is in the microwave regime, so not very difficult if you have the equipment(a microwave generator)
 
wouldn't microwaves be harmful to a human because of the way they spin water molecules?
 
Nerdydude101 said:
wouldn't microwaves be harmful to a human because of the way they spin water molecules?

Only if the power output is high enough to burn someone.
 
Drakkith said:
Only if the power output is high enough to burn someone.

its not just about the power level

even low power microwave signals are dangerous in a confined area or high gain antenna
1 Watt of 24 GHz out the end of a waveguide definitely burns skin in close proximity in a few seconds or so and that would be even more damaging to sensitive body areas like eyes

The OP is talking about 9.5 mm wavelength, ~ 31 GHz a significantly high microwave freq
I haven't operated any gear above 24GHz

cheers
Dave
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K