How high must an object be to not be pulled back to Earth?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DLHill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of escape velocity and the altitude required for an object to avoid being pulled back to Earth. It is established that there is no specific height where gravity ceases to exist; instead, escape velocity is the critical factor. At 100,000 feet (approximately 30.48 km), the escape velocity is about 25,000 mph, which is only slightly lower than at Earth's surface. The Kármán Line, often cited as the boundary of space, is approximately 100 km above sea level, indicating that the atmosphere extends well beyond 13 km.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of escape velocity and its significance in space travel
  • Familiarity with atmospheric layers and their characteristics
  • Knowledge of weather balloon mechanics and limitations
  • Basic principles of gravity and its effects at varying altitudes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Kármán Line and its implications for space travel
  • Learn about the physics of escape velocity and its calculation
  • Explore the design and functionality of weather balloons for high-altitude experiments
  • Investigate air traffic control regulations for amateur rocket launches
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace enthusiasts, amateur rocketry hobbyists, students studying physics, and anyone interested in the mechanics of high-altitude ballooning and space travel.

DLHill
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
My friend and I are using weather balloons and a rocket to send a camera into space. We need to know how far from Earth we must be to not have the camera fall back. The edge of the atmosphere is around 13km and we can easily get past that. We have 2 weather balloons with a 100,000 ft breaking point and a pressure equalizing mechanism. We will have a small rocket launch just before the balloons break and possibly have it stay in space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, but there is no such distance, there is only escape velocity. At 100,000 ft, escape velocity is only slightly lower than on the surface: 25,000 mph.

Also, the atmosphere has no defined edge, but if it did it would be much, much higher than 13km. You're still in commercial airline territory at 13km! If one were forced to define it, we'd probably use 100 km: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kármán_Line
 
russ_watters said:
I'm sorry, but there is no such distance, there is only escape velocity. At 100,000 ft, escape velocity is only slightly lower than on the surface: 25,000 mph.

Also, the atmosphere has no defined edge, but if it did it would be much, much higher than 13km. You're still in commercial airline territory at 13km! If one were forced to define it, we'd probably use 100 km: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kármán_Line

I was told that it was about 13km, but thank you that helps a lot.
 
Gravity falls off at as distance from Earth increases, but it never actually fully disappears. So even if you're on the other side of the galaxy, eventually your camera will fall back down (assuming nothing else pulls it first).

However, if your camera is moving fast enough, it will get slowed down by Earth's gravity, but it will also keep getting further away from the Earth (where gravity is weaker). Effectively, it can "outrun" the Earth's gravity, and so gravity will never actually manage to stop it and pull it back down. This is escape velocity.

Unfortunately, as russ waters pointed out, for objects within hundreds of miles from earth, this velocity is about 25,000 mph.
 
I am curious, if you thought that there is no atmosphere past 13km, on what principle did you imagine your baloons were able to raise twice higher?
 
DLHill, you might find this bried discussion of interest:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_balloon

As a balloon rises, lowering temperatures that would cause contraction of the gas and loss of lift is more than offset by reduced atmospheric pressure wihich causes balloons to expand,is also offset by reduced gravitational attraction.

13km might have been someone's estimate for the altitude where typically 'normal' breathing is significantly diminished. In Denver, for example, the 'mile high city', MMA fighter commentaries often refer to who has trained at altitude and for how long...and who hasn't...apparently even at that very modest altitude, it can make a difference in performance of highly conditioned athletes. In the Himilayas, at close to 9km altitude, climbers routinely use breathing apparatus for the strenuous effort required
 
I hope you have the necessary background education. It's not that easy to get something into orbit. It is rocket science, after all.
 
georgir said:
I am curious, if you thought that there is no atmosphere past 13km, on what principle did you imagine your baloons were able to raise twice higher?

I didn't think that the atmosphere just ended suddenly, I only thought that after around that height, an object is basically considered to be in space.
 
DLHill said:
My friend and I are using weather balloons and a rocket to send a camera into space.
Is it difficult to obtain clearance from air traffic control for such a venture?
 
  • #10
Unfortunately, as russ waters pointed out, for objects within hundreds of miles from earth, this velocity is about 25,000 mph.

Not on ring world it ain't:smile:

Also for objects between Earth and the Moon at a point where the gravity is equal on an object, the escape velocity could be 1mph which is considerably greater distance than hundreds of miles and a lot less than 25,000 mph.:cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K