How High Was the Elevator When the Nut Fell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SS2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the height of an elevator when a nut falls from it while moving upwards at 3 m/s. The nut takes 5 seconds to reach the ground, leading to a target height of 107.5 meters. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct equations of motion, particularly focusing on initial velocity and acceleration. Suggestions include drawing a diagram to clarify the directions of velocity and acceleration, which aids in applying the equations correctly. The conversation highlights the need for careful attention to signs in the equations to arrive at the correct solution.
SS2006
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
A nut falls off of an elevator moving upwards at 3 m/s. The nut takes 5 s to hit the ground.

Q) How high was the elevator the instant the nut fell off , the answer should be 107.5 metres

i solved this a few weeks ago, now i just can't remmeber it :( casue the test is in 2 days
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ooops... Well on the bright side, I find solving a problem more than once, reinforces the concepts I'm learning..

How about posting what you have tried so far and show where you are getting stuck? There are many here, who can help steer you in the right direction.
 
well i just can't reach 107.5 m
ive tried v2=v1+at
and d = v1t + 1/2 at squared, the ones that worked last time, i think I am using the wrong numbers
 
v = v_0 + at
&
v^2 - v_0 = 2as
 
This is pretty straight forward,
simply plug your time (5s) into

d = - \frac {gt^2} 2 + V_0t + h

What would your V_0 and h be?
 
Did you draw a diagram of your problem, with arrows indicating which direction velocity is moving, which direction acceleration is moving and positions of object?

Let's see, what does the first equation (v2=v1+at) tell you?
Given an intial velocity v1, and an acceleration a, it tells you an object's velocity after some time t.

But you are interested in height (or distance), so first equation doesn't do very much for you.

If you drew arrows indicating the direction of your variables on your initial diagram, you want to also indicate direction in your equation (up or right as + , down or left as -). Using this concept, make sure you use the appropriate signs + or - , in your 2nd equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top