How Is ASSASSINATION Arranged Without Adjacent S's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Perpendicular
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinatorics
Perpendicular
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
The problem is : In how many ways can the letters of the word ASSASSINATION be arranged so that no two Ss are next to each other ?

Tried taking the interval to the first S as x1, from then to the next S as x2...etc. with sum being 9.

Possible partitions , including repeats, comes out as 211. This is the part where I am doubtful. Normally, I'd say ans would be (9!/4!) x 211, but the answer is given as (9!/4!) x 205.

what exactly is the error ? I am trying to assume x1 = 0, x2 = 1, x3 = 1 at which point 7 spaces remain , which can be partitioned in 7 ways among the remaining parts. An AP forms with 7,6,5.. for x3 > 1 which I solve for those cases using brute force to get 211...am I correct ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perpendicular said:
The problem is : In how many ways can the letters of the word ASSASSINATION be arranged so that no two Ss are next to each other ?

Tried taking the interval to the first S as x1, from then to the next S as x2...etc. with sum being 9.

Possible partitions , including repeats, comes out as 211. This is the part where I am doubtful. Normally, I'd say ans would be (9!/4!) x 211, but the answer is given as (9!/4!) x 205.

what exactly is the error ? I am trying to assume x1 = 0, x2 = 1, x3 = 1 at which point 7 spaces remain , which can be partitioned in 7 ways among the remaining parts. An AP forms with 7,6,5.. for x3 > 1 which I solve for those cases using brute force to get 211...am I correct ?

Hey Perpendicular and welcome to the forums.

One suggestion I have is to break your problem firstly into a different problem.

We know that the S's can't be next to each other so first consider finding the problem of if we have two groups A and B where A is an S and B is anything else, then what is the probability of getting no two A's next to each other. B in this case is any combination of characters that allows us to have an alternation between A and B. For example given four S's we have to have BABABABAB or ABABABAB as our only choices but for this to happen we need to have enough non S's left over for all of the later B's. So in this way we have only two choice's in terms of the A's and B's.

Now from this we need to find all of the combinations for the B's in the problem above. They can be arranged in any way as long as we have enough elements left over in the later B's so that we have enough B's for the 1st and second situation. We then calculate the combinations for each situation, add them up and that will give you the frequency information. If you need a probability then divide it by 13! to get a total probability.

Using this hint, does this make it easier to solve the problem?
 
I would find out how many ways you can arrange AAINATION.

Now, for each arrangement of AAINATION, you have 10 "slots" in which you are allowed to put AT MOST one S. So, now you have to find how many ways there are to choose 4 spots from 10 spots to place the 4 S's.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top