How is E=mc^2 connected to the speed of light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeadCat_86
  • Start date Start date
DeadCat_86
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In the mass-energy equivalent equation, E=mc^2, why is it related to the speed of light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the formula for rest energy predicted by Special Relativity.

From the postulates of SR (Invariance of c, physical laws are the same in all inertial frames) one can derive the equations describing energy:
E_{tot}=\gamma mc^2
E_k=(\gamma -1)mc^2
which lead to the conclusion that a mass has a rest energy E_0=mc^2 which is called the mass-energy equivalence.

So the the short answer is that it follows from the postulates of SR.

For a more in depth description detailing how the equation is derived, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass-energy_equivalence#Background
 
Merry Christmas!

DeadCat_86 said:
In the mass-energy equivalent equation, E=mc^2, why is it related to the speed of light?

He DeadCat_86! Have a bouncy Christmas! :smile:

e is energy, which is ML2/T2, while m is of course just M,

so the conversion factor must have dimensions of L2/T2, ie it has to be a velocity squared …

and c is the only non-arbitrary velocity for such a general equation! :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes zdroide


tiny-tim said:
He DeadCat_86! Have a bouncy Christmas! :smile:

e is energy, which is ML2/T2, while m is of course just M,

so the conversion factor must have dimensions of L2/T2, ie it has to be a velocity squared …

and c is the only non-arbitrary velocity for such a general equation! :wink:

Dimensional analysis saves the day yet again!
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
980
Back
Top