How Is Effective Weight Calculated in a Spinning Carnival Ride?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Violagirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weight
AI Thread Summary
The effective weight of a girl in a spinning carnival ride is calculated using the formula we = m √(g² + (v²/R)²), where g is gravitational acceleration, v is her speed, and R is the radius of the cage. This approach utilizes the Pythagorean theorem because the gravitational force and centripetal acceleration act in perpendicular directions. The effective weight is greater than her actual weight (mg) due to the additional centripetal force. Understanding the vector components of these forces clarifies the need for the Pythagorean theorem in this context. This discussion highlights the importance of recognizing the directions of forces when calculating effective weight in non-linear motion scenarios.
Violagirl
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On a carnival ride, a girl of mass m stands in a cylindrical cage of radius R. The cage is spun about its cylindrical axis so that her speed is v. What is her effective weight?

Homework Equations


we= mg-ma

wxe = mv/R2, wey = -mg

The Attempt at a Solution


This is an example problem in my book and I'm not sure how they put everything together to solve it. Upon presenting the above forumulas, it says to next use the Pythagorean theorem for it to get:

we = m √g2 + (v2/R)2

Then goes on to say that the girl's effective weight is greater than mg.
I'm not sure how they set up their formula into the Pythagorean formula from the formulas above. Any clarification would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mg-ma is only the effective weight when the acceleration and gravity are in the same direction (or with sign of 'a' reversed for opposite directions). But in this problem, gravity and acceleration are not parallel or anti-parallel.

Think about the centripetal and gravitational forces. Which directions will they be in? From this, you can see why they use Pythagoras' formula.
 
BruceW said:
mg-ma is only the effective weight when the acceleration and gravity are in the same direction (or with sign of 'a' reversed for opposite directions). But in this problem, gravity and acceleration are not parallel or anti-parallel.

Think about the centripetal and gravitational forces. Which directions will they be in? From this, you can see why they use Pythagoras' formula.

Oh! Ok, that makes more sense, I didn't understand in reading my textbook, thanks for clarifying! So then, they each form their own vectors in coming together to produce a triangle, which is why Pythagorean Thorem is needed. Thank you!
 
yep, that's it :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top