How is energy conserved by magnet lifting a metallic object

In summary, when a permanent magnet is suspended by a string over a metallic object and the magnet is slowly lowered until the object is attracted to it, the object acquires both kinetic and potential energy. The kinetic energy is dissipated as heat within the magnet, while the end result is a magnet that has acquired heat energy and an object that has acquired potential energy. This closed system conserves energy by reducing the energy stored in the magnetic field, which is equal to the work done on the object to increase its kinetic and gravitational potential energy. This explanation should help resolve any confusion and questions regarding energy conservation in this scenario.
  • #1
tmhen
3
0
Assume a strong permanent magnet is suspended by a string over a metallic object. The magnet is slowly lowered until the object is attracted to the magnet. For this to occur the object acquired both kinetic and potential energy. Since the object comes to rest upon hitting the magnet, I assume the kinetic energy is dissipated as heat within the magnet. But considering only the closed system of the magnet and the object, the end result is a magnet that has acquired heat energy and an object that has acquired potential energy. Please explain how energy is conserved in this closed system.

Thanks for helping resolve this for a group of us with too much time on our hands.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The energy stored in the magnetic field is reduced. The reduction in the field's energy is equal to the work done on the object, both the work done increasing its KE and also the work done increasing its gravitational PE.
 
  • Like
Likes davidbenari
  • #3
Thank you for answering our question. Bunch of old guys to far removed from Physics 101. We apologize if this was too similar to other posts.
 
  • #4
No problem! Let us know if you have any follow up questions.
 

1. How does a magnet lift a metallic object?

A magnet has two poles, a north pole and a south pole, which have opposite charges. When a magnet is brought near a metallic object, the object's electrons align with the magnetic field of the magnet. The electrons at the end closest to the north pole become positively charged, while the electrons at the end closest to the south pole become negatively charged. This creates an attractive force between the magnet and the metallic object, causing the object to be lifted.

2. What is the relationship between magnetism and energy conservation?

Energy conservation refers to the principle that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted. In the case of a magnet lifting a metallic object, the energy required to lift the object comes from the magnetic field of the magnet. This energy is conserved as it is transferred from the magnet to the object, allowing the object to be lifted without any additional energy input.

3. Can a magnet lift any metallic object?

No, a magnet can only lift metallic objects that contain ferromagnetic materials, such as iron, nickel, or cobalt. These materials have the ability to become magnetized when placed in a magnetic field, allowing them to be lifted by a magnet.

4. Does the weight of the metallic object affect the amount of energy conserved by the magnet?

Yes, the weight of the metallic object does affect the amount of energy conserved by the magnet. The heavier the object, the more energy is required to lift it. This energy is conserved as it is transferred from the magnet to the object, but the amount of energy required may vary depending on the weight of the object.

5. How does the distance between the magnet and the metallic object affect energy conservation?

The distance between the magnet and the metallic object does not affect energy conservation. As long as the object is within the magnetic field of the magnet, the energy required to lift it will be conserved. However, the strength of the magnetic field may decrease with distance, which can affect the force of attraction between the magnet and the object.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
12
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
828
Replies
1
Views
961
Replies
2
Views
15K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
276
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top