How Is Energy Dissipated When Braking a Car?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy dissipated when braking a 1200-kg car from 30 m/s to a stop, resulting in an energy loss of 540,000 Joules. Participants debate the correct representation of energy in equations, noting that energy is a scalar and should not be represented as negative, although the loss of energy can be described as a decrease. The importance of maintaining consistent units on both sides of equations is emphasized to avoid common errors. Clarifications are made regarding the interpretation of energy changes, with the consensus that the energy dissipated by the brakes is the positive value of the calculated loss. Overall, the conversation highlights the significance of proper equation setup and unit management in physics calculations.
physkid1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. How much energy is dissipated in braking a 1200-kg car to a stop from an initial speed of 30 m/s?



2. 1/2 mv(final)^2 - 1/2 mv(initial)^2



3. 1/2 x 1200 x 0^2 - 1/2 x 1200 x 30^2 = 540000J

is this right ? cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physkid1 said:
1. How much energy is dissipated in braking a 1200-kg car to a stop from an initial speed of 30 m/s?



2. 1/2 mv(final)^2 - 1/2 mv(initial)^2



3. 1/2 x 1200 x 0^2 - 1/2 x 1200 x 30^2 = 540000J

is this right ? cheers

looks OK
 
physkid1 said:
1/2 x 1200 x 0^2 - 1/2 x 1200 x 30^2 = 540000J
Shouldn't the right hand side be -540000 ?
And where did the J come from? If you don't have units in the left side of the equation, why did you put units on the right side?
 
omoplata said:
Shouldn't the right hand side be -540000 ?
And where did the J come from? If you don't have units in the left side of the equation, why did you put units on the right side?

Energy is a scalar, so is never negative [nor positive, nor up nor down nor North or any other direction] it is just a value.

The unit of energy is Joule, so a J is probably very appropriate.
 
PeterO said:
Energy is a scalar, so is never negative [nor positive, nor up nor down nor North or any other direction] it is just a value.
Scalars can be negative.

Example 1: If the potential energy due to a point mass infinity at an infinite distance is assumed to be zero, then the potential energy at a finite distance from the mass is negative.
Example 2: If the increase of kinetic energy in the car in this problem is negative, that means the energy has decreased. i.e. the car has lost energy.

Also refer to https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=270612" thread.

PeterO said:
The unit of energy is Joule, so a J is probably very appropriate.

The equation can be written down so the units on the left hand side and right hand side are equal, which the OP has not done. Also, the OP ignores the sign of the answer. So, technically, it is not an "equation" at all.

Getting into the habit of writing down correct equations to begin with can help students a lot, in avoiding common errors that happen because of misinterpretation of units etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
omoplata said:
Scalars can be negative.

Example 1: If the potential energy due to a point mass infinity at an infinite distance is assumed to be zero, then the potential energy at a finite distance from the mass is negative.
Example 2: If the increase of kinetic energy in the car in this problem is negative, that means the energy has decreased. i.e. the car has lost energy.

Also refer to https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=270612" thread.



The equation can be written down so the units on the left hand side and right hand side are equal, which the OP has not done. Also, the OP ignores the sign of the answer. So, technically, it is not an "equation" at all.

Getting into the habit of writing down correct equations to begin with can help students a lot, in avoiding common errors that happen because of misinterpretation of units etc.

OK try this:
By how much does the Gravitational Potential Energy of a 10 kg mass change for a trip between ground level and the top of a 12 m building?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
PeterO said:
OK try this:
By how much does the Gravitational Potential Energy of a 10 kg mass change for a trip between ground level and the top of a 12 m building?
The potential energy change is approximately 10 kg * 9.81 m/s^2 * 12m.

What's your point?
 
omoplata said:
The potential energy change is approximately 10 kg * 9.81 m/s^2 * 12m.

What's your point?

I was interested to see if you fill a calculation up with units as you go - you apparently do; never seen anyone else do that - and I was also interested to see if you would first want to know whether the mass was going from the ground to the building, or the building to the ground - which didn't worry you.
 
PeterO said:
I was interested to see if you fill a calculation up with units as you go - you apparently do; never seen anyone else do that - and I was also interested to see if you would first want to know whether the mass was going from the ground to the building, or the building to the ground - which didn't worry you.

I sometimes don't use units either. But I always have the left and right sides of an equation balanced, and that includes the units.

Because the question didn't state whether it was going up or down, I simply assumed that they are asking for the numerical value of the energy change.
 
  • #10
omoplata said:
Shouldn't the right hand side be -540000 ?
And where did the J come from? If you don't have units in the left side of the equation, why did you put units on the right side?
Very simple - yes, by the calculation there should be a negative sign on the other side of the equation. However, that is the energy removed from the car. Thus, the energy dissipated by the brakes is the positive value of that.
 
Back
Top