How Is Equation 15.5.7 Derived in Schaum's Outline of Quantum Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
Equation 15.5.7 in Schaum's Outline of Quantum Mechanics can be derived by substituting the sine function using the relation sin[x] = (exp[ix] - exp[-ix])/(2i) into Equation 15.5.6. After expanding, it is suggested to separate the resulting equation into real and imaginary components. The first part of Equation 15.5.7 corresponds to the imaginary part, while the second part represents the real part, derived from the orthogonality of the functions e^{ikr} and e^{-ikr}. This orthogonality implies that the equation αe^{ikr} + βe^{-ikr} = 0 can only hold if both coefficients are zero. The discussion emphasizes the importance of these substitutions and properties in deriving the equations correctly.
jhon
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
in Schaum's Outline of Theory and Problems of Quantum Mechanics

how did they got eq 15.5.7

qpnns5.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try using the relation

\sin[x]=\frac{\exp[ix]-\exp[-ix]}{2i}

in Equation 15.5.6 and expanding to see what you get? It looks like you should get the result they obtain if you work at it using that relation.
 
the second eq II ?? it's equale zero why??
 
If you have expanded Equation 15.5.6 using the substitution given, try separating the resulting equation into the real and imaginary components. It looks to me like Equation I in 15.5.7 is the imaginary part and Equation II of 15.5.7 is the real part after substituting for \sin[x].
 
I don't think that the two parts of 15.5.7 are the real and imaginary parts of 15.5.6, but rather they result from the fact that e^{ikr} and e^{-ikr} are orthogonal functions of r, and hence the relation \alpha e^{ikr}+\beta e^{-ikr}=0[/itex] can only be true for all r if \alpha=\beta=0.
 
jdwood983 and gabbagabbahey thanks for help
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top