How is f(x)=sqrt(x) a valid function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CuriousBanker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The square root function f(x) = sqrt(x) is considered valid because it adheres to the definition of a function, which states that each input must have a single output. While the equation a^2 = x yields both positive and negative solutions, the square root function specifically refers to the positive solution, denoted as sqrt(x). This convention is not an oversight but a standard practice to maintain the function's validity. Thus, sqrt(x) is defined as the positive number a such that a^2 = x, effectively providing a unique output for each input. The discussion clarifies that this approach does not ignore solutions but rather specifies the principal square root.
CuriousBanker
Messages
190
Reaction score
24
Hello

My teacher has told me the square root function is a valid function. He has also told me that a function cannot possibly have two different output for one given input. 36^1/2 for instance has both -6 and +6 as answers. He told me to just refer to the positive square root...eh, that seems kind of sloppy to just ignore half of the answers out of convenience, no?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
##\sqrt x## is defined to be the positive number ##a## such that ##a^2=x##. It isn't ignoring half the answers unless you are asked for the numbers ##a## that solve the equation ##a^2=x## and give the answer ##\sqrt x## instead of ##\pm\sqrt x##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top