How Is Redshift Calculated in Changing Epochs?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the rate of change of redshift (z) with respect to time (t0) in the context of an expanding universe. The key equation presented is \(\frac{dz}{dt_{o}}=(1+z)H_{o}-H(z)\), which connects redshift to the Hubble parameter. Participants express confusion about differentiating the relationship between redshift and the scale factor, particularly regarding the proper time intervals and their dependence on the expansion parameter. The Hubble parameter is defined as \(H(t) = \frac{\dot{a}(t)}{a(t)}\), and understanding the time derivatives is crucial for solving the problem. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying cosmological principles to calculate redshift changes over time.
ajclarke
Messages
34
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The redshift of a galaxy is measured at the present epoch t0 and again at the infnitesimal future epoch t0 + δt0. Show that the rate of change of z with t0 is given by

\frac{dz}{dt_{o}}=(1+z)H_{o}-H(z)

Homework Equations



Hint - Start From:

\frac{\delta z}{\delta t_{o}}=\frac{\delta z}{\delta t_{o}}+\frac{\delta z}{\delta t}\frac{dt}{dt_{o}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Haven't a clue tbh. Don't even know where to begin :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does redshift depend on the expansion parameter?
 
[PLAIN]http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/8478/screenshot20110130at114.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's the Friedmann equation, written in terms of the redshift using the fundamental relationship

z(t) = \frac{a(t_0)}{a(t)} -1.

This is the formula you need to derive the relationship in your OP.
 
I think I'm being dense here

z(t)=\frac{a(t_{0})}{a(t)}-1= \frac{H_{o}}{H(z)}-1

\frac{\delta z}{\delta t_{o}}= \frac{\delta}{\delta t_{o}}(\frac{H_{o}}{H(z)}-1)\frac{\delta}{\delta t}= \frac{\delta}{\delta t}(\frac{H_{o}}{H(z)}-1)

\frac{dt}{dt_{o}}

However there is no time involved in them. Ho and H(t) are just constants. I understand the principle that they are specific to time but I don't understand how to perform the differentiation to get the answer
 
Last edited:
The Hubble parameter is

H(t) = \frac{\dot{a}(t)}{a(t)},

so the RHS of your 1st line is incorrect. In your problem the time derivatives act on the scale factors. You only rewrite it in terms of H(z) as a last step.
 
That terminology has confused me somewhat. The \dot{a} is the scale factor at some unknown time and a alone is the scale factor at the present epoch?

Or the other way around?

I'll have a tinker. I still feel a bit lost. Maybe writing some stuff down will help me out some

Thanks =]
 
No, the dot means derivative. So

\dot{a}(t) = \frac{da(t)}{dt},

while

\dot{a}(t_0) = \frac{da(t_0)}{dt_0}.
 
So far I have:

z(t)=\frac{a(t_{o})}{a(t)}-1 = \frac{1}{a(t)}-1

Since a(to)=1 by definition,

Thus:

\frac{\delta z}{\delta t_{o}} = 0

\frac{\delta z}{\delta t}=-a(t)^-2

\frac{dt}{dt_{o}}

And now I am at another brick wall.
 
  • #10
ajclarke said:
So far I have:

z(t)=\frac{a(t_{o})}{a(t)}-1 = \frac{1}{a(t)}-1

Since a(to)=1 by definition,

You shouldn't try to set a(t_0)=1 when you're going to be varying things with respect to t_0.

Thus:

\frac{\delta z}{\delta t_{o}} = 0

\frac{\delta z}{\delta t}=-a(t)^-2

\frac{dt}{dt_{o}}

And now I am at another brick wall.

To compute dt/dt_0 you might go back to the derivation of the redshift formula to see how the proper time interval depends on the scale factor.
 
Back
Top