How Is Summation Changed to Integration in Reif's Statistical Mechanics?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
Abhishek11235
Messages
174
Reaction score
39
This is the text from Reif Statistical mechanics. In the screenshot he changes the summation to integral(Eq. 1.5.17) by saying that they are approximately continuous values. However,I don't see how. Can anyone justify this change?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2019-03-22-13-02-21.png
    Screenshot_2019-03-22-13-02-21.png
    74.2 KB · Views: 526
Physics news on Phys.org
Abhishek11235 said:
This is the text from Reif Statistical mechanics. In the screenshot he changes the summation to integral(Eq. 1.5.17) by saying that they are approximately continuous values. However,I don't see how. Can anyone justify this change?
Do you understand the relation between summation and integrals?

 
Abhishek11235 said:
Can anyone justify this change?
Basic ideas that you start with in Calculus take you from big steps to small steps and then you look at the limit as the step size approaches zero. That sort of relationship can be regarded as as 'continuous'. BUT that doesn't apply to all relationships. Not all relationships or mathematical functions are 'continuous and differentiable' over their whole range and you cannot do simple calculus in those cases. It is lucky (?) that most of the Physics we start off with is amenable to basic calculus methods (differentiation and integration). If you want to get deep into mathematical analysis methods then it will make you able to make choices about when you can and when you can't use basic calculus but, if you are like most of us, you just stick to the 'rules' that they use in book work and you won't go far wrong.