How Is the Average Force on a Bullet Calculated?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average force exerted on a bullet fired from a .45 caliber pistol. The bullet's speed is given as 262 m/s, and it takes 1 ms to travel through the barrel, leading to an average acceleration of 2.62 x 10^5 m/s². The participant questions the book's stated average force of 0.4 x 10 N, suspecting it to be a printing error. By applying the formula F = ma, the calculated average force is approximately 0.43092 x 10^5 N, which supports the idea that the book may have omitted the exponent. The conclusion suggests that the discrepancy is likely due to a typographical mistake in the provided answers.
highc
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Ok, I'm using Schaum's Outline of College Physics to supplement my ultra condensed correspondance physics course. As I work through the "Supplementary Problems" I've come across this one which leaves me puzzled.

Typically a bullet leaves a standard 45 caliber pistol (5.0 inch barrel) at a speed of 262 m/s. If it takes 1 ms to traverse the barrel, determine the average acceleration by the 16.2 g bullet within the gun and then compute the average force exerted on it. The provided answers are: 3.0 x 10^5 m/s, 0.4 x 10 N.

I've had no problem working out the average acceleration to 2.62 x 10^5 m/s (3.0 X 10^5 m/s), but I have no idea how the book has arrived at 40 N for the average force exerted.

Does anybody care to show how this was worked out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is obviously an error in the book. With 2.62 x 10^5 m/s² (don't forget to square s) as the average acceleration, the average force, which is given by the proportionality of force and acceleration

F_{av}=ma_{av}

turns out to be 0.43092 x 10^5 N, which would round down to 0.4 x 10^5 N. So it's probably just a printing error; they forgot the ^5.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K