How is the -(ct)^2 term in Minkowski metric conceived?

jakesee
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am just trying to understand Special Relativity by reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_special_relativity

All is ok except where in "The Minkowski formulation: introduction of spacetime",
the introduction of -(ct)^2 term is not clearly justified (or so it seems to me) in the article.

Will someone explain to me, or guide me to some reference where I can find answers to:
1. Why is it negative instead of positive?
2. Why is speed of light chosen?

On another related note, I have read about the claim/observation/proposition that speed of light is constant for all observers in their own reference frames. But it is not clear whether this is the consequence of experimental result or the inherent characteristic of modelling the space-time coordinate using speed of light as one of the parameters. If it is an experimental observation, what is the experimental set up like? i.e. How is the measurement taken? Any help is appreciated. thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jakesee said:
Will someone explain to me, or guide me to some reference where I can find answers to:
1. Why is it negative instead of positive?
2. Why is speed of light chosen?
1) Because that is how the dimensions of Minkowski space time are defined. See this thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=333705

2) Convenience. It makes nice graphs if you scale the axes like this.
jakesee said:
If it is an experimental observation, what is the experimental set up like?
Did you see the sticky thread on top the forum?
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=229034
Look for "Michelson and Morley"
 
A.T. said:
Did you see the sticky thread on top the forum?
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=229034
Look for "Michelson and Morley"

Opps, my bad. I read the "READ ME FIRST" but totally missed the first sticky. Sorry.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top