How is the integration of displacement performed in this scenario?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyle.Nemeth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
The integration of displacement in this scenario involves calculating the change in kinetic energy using the formula ΔK = ½m(vf² - v0²). The integral is performed over the variable v², with limits adjusted accordingly to match the variable, leading to the expression ½m∫ d(v²) = ½m∫ v dv. The discussion highlights that while the book uses bounds from v0 to vf, it is also valid to express the bounds in terms of v². The relationship d(v²) = 2v dv indicates the application of the chain rule in this context. Overall, understanding the physical interpretation of the variables is crucial for accurate integration.
Kyle.Nemeth
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
How was this integration performed?

½m∫ d(v2) = ½m(vf2 - v02) = ΔK

A book on a table is displaced by a net force in the positive x direction, which changes the speed of the book. The integral was taken over the initial speed to the final speed and I'm not quite sure how to incorporate boundaries on my integral with this site (sorry!).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
## \frac 12 m \int_{v_0}^{v_f} d(v^2) ## is saying that your variable is ##v^2##, so your limits of integration should match your variable, which would give you:
## \frac 12 m \int_{v_0^2}^{v_f^2} d(v^2) ##
This is essentially just an integral like
##\int_a^b 1 dx = \left. x \right|_a^b = b-a##.
 
Thank you for the help, I understand now, but there's one more thing that I'm having trouble with also.

I'm looking at this in my book, "Physics for Scientists and Engineers 9th Edition" by Raymond Serway and John Jewett, Jr. In the book, their bounds of integration are not from v02 to vf2, but are just from v0 to vf.

Also, would I not be justified in doing something like this,

½m∫ d(v2) = ½m∫ v dv ?
 
Close. ##d(v^2) = 2v dv##, so you could do that too. The bounds were given in terms of the variable v, so sometimes it's easier to change the bounds to match the variable and sometimes its easier to change the variable to match the bounds. In either case, I think that the book's notation can lead to confusion if you just try to do the math without thinking about the physical interpretation.
##\int_{v=v_0}^{v = v_f} d(v^2) = \int_{v^2=v_0^2}^{v^2 = v_f^2} 1 d(v^2) = \int_{v=v_0}^{v = v_f} 2v dv##
 
So then, for

d(v2) = 2vdv

Are we applying the chain rule somehow?
 
We are taking ##\frac{d v^2}{dv} = 2v## and moving the dv to the right. *edit* Or using the chain rule--both are correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Kyle.Nemeth
Great. Thank you for your help.
 
Back
Top