How Is the Number of Particles Calculated in a 1D Diffusion Slab?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of particles in a 1D diffusion slab using the diffusion equation. The concentration of particles is given by the equation n'(x,t) = N/sqrt(4piDt) * exp(-x^2/4DT). A participant initially struggles with integrating the exponential function between specific limits but is reminded that the integral of a function over a small interval can be approximated as f(x) dx. This clarification helps resolve the confusion about the integration process. The thread highlights the importance of understanding basic integration concepts in the context of diffusion calculations.
poiuy
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The solution to the diffusion equation in 1D may be written as follows:
n'(x,t) = N/sqrt(4piDt) * exp(-x^2/4DT)

where n'(x,t) is the concentration of the particles at position x at time t, N is the total number of particles and D is the diffusion coefficient.

Write down an expression for the number of particles in a slab of thickness dx located at position x.

I assumed it would be the integral of the function between x and x+dx with respect to x.

However exp(-x^2/4Dt) can't be integrated between these values. I have a standard integral for exp(-ax^2) which is 0.5 sqrt (pi/a) but this only applies to integrating between zero and infinity.If anybody could point me in the right direction it would be greatly appreciated, I think I am missing something obvious here and this is a really simple question.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
poiuy said:
The solution to the diffusion equation in 1D may be written as follows:



n'(x,t) = N/sqrt(4piDt) * exp(-x^2/4DT)

where n'(x,t) is the concentration of the particles at position x at time t, N is the total number of particles and D is the diffusion coefficient.

Write down an expression for the number of particles in a slab of thickness dx located at position x.


I assumed it would be the integral of the function between x and x+dx with respect to x.

However exp(-x^2/4Dt) can't be integrated between these values. I have a standard integral for exp(-ax^2) which is 0.5 sqrt (pi/a) but this only applies to integrating between zero and infinity.


If anybody could point me in the right direction it would be greatly appreciated, I think I am missing something obvious here and this is a really simple question.

Thanks
Welcome to the forums!

Note that the integrale of any function f(x) between x and x +dx is simply f(x) dx!

\int_x^{x+dx} f(x') dx' \approx f(x) dx
 
Wow thanks, incredible that I could have had 14 years of education and never been taught that, thanks very much.
 
Actually thinking about it, it's incredible that I couldn't work that out for myself.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top