How Is the Particle Density Operator Defined?

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
There is something I do not understand. One way to define the current density operator is through the particle density operator Ï(r). From the fundamental interpretation of the wavefunction we have:

Ï(r)= lψ(r)l2

But my book takes this a step further by rewriting the equality above:

lψ(r)l2 = ∫dr' ψ*(r')δ(r-r')ψ(r')

And thus identifies the particle density operator as the delta function above. How does this make sense in any way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We have <r|Ï|r> = ∫dr' ψ*(r')δ(r-r')ψ(r')
where do you see a possible identification?
|ψ(r)|² is found on the diagonal of rho not on delta.
 
In general, we write expectation of operator A as ##\displaystyle \langle \psi |A|\psi \rangle = \int \psi^*(r') A \psi(r') dr'##. Substituting ##A = \delta(r-r')## gives you the correct expression for expectation of ##\rho(r)##. So what's the problem?
 
Yes but
<r|ψ><ψ|r'> = <r|Ï|r'> is not identified to δ(r-r') like aaa202 said.
it is not here an average value but an element of a density matrix.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top