How is the RMS of a Sine Wave Derived?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter xlq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sine Sine wave Wave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the derivation of the root mean square (RMS) value of a sine wave, particularly in the context of electrical currents and power calculations. Participants explore the mathematical integration of sine squared functions and related trigonometric identities, as well as address a separate query regarding power applied to a vibrating string.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the RMS of a sine wave is derived as peak * 1/SQRT(2) and seeks clarification on this derivation.
  • Another participant explains that the average power is derived from integrating sine squared over a specific interval, leading to the conclusion that the average power level is 1/2.
  • Several participants discuss the integration of sine squared using trigonometric identities, particularly the identity sin²(t) = 1/2(1 - cos(2t)).
  • One participant challenges the previous claims about the average value of sine squared, arguing that the integral over a period does not yield the average and suggests using the average value theorem instead.
  • A separate question about the power applied to a string is raised, with participants noting the lack of sufficient information to provide a definitive answer.
  • Another participant suggests that additional context regarding the wavelength of the string might clarify the power calculation question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correct method for calculating the average value of sine squared, with some participants supporting the integration approach while others advocate for the average value theorem. The discussion regarding the power applied to the string remains unresolved due to insufficient information.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the integration steps and the assumptions underlying the average power calculations. The discussion also highlights the dependence on specific definitions and conditions related to the sine wave and the string problem.

xlq
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
rms of sine wave = peak * 1/SQRT(2)

how is this derived from the rms equation?

(Search engines have returned no useful results.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The original sine wave is take to represent a current. This current is squared to get the power. P=I^2. Integrating sine squared between from time 0 to pi gives;

\int_0^{\pi} \sin^2{t} dt = \frac{\pi}{2}

This is the same a multiplying the constant power 1/2 by the time pi seconds.

So 1/2 is the "average" power level, and since I = sqrt(P), 1/sqrt(2) is the "average" current level needed to obtain a meaningful powerlevel result.
 
OK thanks. One more question: how did you integrate the sine-squared?
 
use the trig identity sin^2(t)=1/2(1-cos(2t) (it might be +, i can't remember. Derive it from the double angle formula for cos(2t)) :)
 
OK thanks. One more question: how did you integrate the sine-squared?

sin^2 + cos^2 =1. The rest is trivial.
 
how do u use sin^2 + cos^2 =1 to evaluate the integral of sin² mathman?
 
mathman said:
sin^2 + cos^2 =1. The rest is trivial.
No. That was the trivial part. The rest is hard.

Using the double angle cossine formula;

\cos{2\theta} = cos^2{\theta} - sin^2{\theta} = 1 - 2\sin^2{\theta}
Therefore;
2\sin^2{\theta}= 1-\cos{2\theta}
\Rightarrow \sin^2{\theta}= \frac{1}{2} \left(1-\cos{2\theta} \right)

So that means the integral can be evaluated as follows.

\int_0^{\pi} \sin^2{\theta} d\theta = \int_0^{\pi} \frac{1}{2} \left(1-\cos{2\theta} \right) d\theta
= \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\pi}1 d\theta -\frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\pi} \cos{2\theta} d\theta
= \frac{1}{2} \left[ \theta |_0^{\pi}\right] + \frac{1}{4}\left[ \sin{2\theta}|_0^{\pi}\right]
= \frac{1}{2} ( \pi - 0) \frac{1}{4} ( 0 - 0) = \frac{\pi}{2}
 
Last edited:
sin2(x) is just cos2(x) shifted by pi/2, and each have a period of pi, so their integrals over 0 to pi are equal. Thus:

\pi=\int_0^\pi dx = \int_0^\pi (\sin^2 x + \cos^2 x) dx = 2 \int_0^\pi \sin^2 x dx
 
how do u use sin^2 + cos^2 =1 to evaluate the integral of sin² mathman?
Integral of sin^2 = integral of cos^2, so each must be 1/2 of the integral of 1.
 
  • #10


Schaums - Theory and Problems of Electric Circuits (4nd ed) 1.3- Solution \copyright

Sin squared = 1 - cosine 2x

1.3 A certain circuit element has a current i = 2.5 sin \omegat (mA), where \omega is the angular frequency in rad/s, and a voltage difference v = 45 sin \omegat (V) between terminals. Find the average power P_{avg} and the energy W_{T} transferred in one period of the sine function.


RECALL THAT : VOLTAGE(v) X CURRENT(i) = WORK(W_{T})

2.5 X 45 = 112.5 so...

W_{T} = \int_{0}^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} vi dt = W_{T} = 112.5 \int_{0}^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} \sin x^2 dt


RECALL TRIGONMETRY IDENTITY sin^2x = 1/2(1- cos2x)

W_{T} = \int_{0}^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} \sin x^2 dt = W_{T} = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} (1 - \cos 2x) dt

WE NOW HAVE ...

W_{T} = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} (1 - \cos 2x) dt

CALCULUS IDENTITY FOR \int\cos(x) dx = \sin x + C
PROOF with U Substitution : Let u = 2x THEN
\frac{du}{dx} = 2 AND dx = \frac{1}{2}du
\int\cos\2x = \int\cos u\frac{1}{2}du
\frac{1}{2}\int\cos u du
\frac{1}{2}\sin u + C
\frac{1}{2}\sin2x + C


SO NOW ...

\left[ \frac{1}{2} ( x - \frac{1}{2} \sin 2x ) \right]_{0}^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}}


NOW UPPER AND LOWER INTEGRATION GIVES

\left[ \frac{1}{2} ( x - \frac{1}{2} \sin 2x ) \right]_{}^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} - \left[ \frac{1}{2} ( x - \frac{1}{2} \sin 2x ) \right]_{0}^{\frac{}}


SUBSTITUTION HERE ... AFTER SUBSTITUTION RECALL TRIGONOMETRY SINE \frac{\pi}{\theta} = 0

\left[ \frac{1}{2} ( ( \frac{2\pi}{\omega} ) - \frac{1}{2} \sin 2 ( \frac{2\pi}{\omega} ) ) \right]_{}^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} - \left[ \frac{1}{2} ( ( 0 ) - \frac{1}{2} \sin 2 ( 0 ) ) \right]_{0}^{\frac{}}

OK ... THIS IS WHAT'S LEFT

W_{T} = 112.5 \left[ ( \frac{1}{2} ) ( \frac{2\pi}{\omega} ) - 0 \right]

THEREFORE:

W_{T} = 112.5 \left[ ( \frac{\pi}{\omega} ) \right] = ( \frac{ 112.5\pi}{\omega} ) \right]

FINALLY:


P_{avg} = ( \frac{ W_{T} }{ \frac { 2\pi}{\omega}} ) = 56.25mW
 
Last edited:
  • #11


The answers given above by ObsessiveMathsFreak, namely that the average is \frac{\pi}{2} is wrong.

The integral over a period will *not* give the average, merely the area under the curve, which should be obvious to everyone who provided the answers - as proof consider that the average of \sin^2(\theta) over any whole period should be the same, be it from 0 to \pi or from 0 to 500\pi. Yet, with the above answers this is clearly not the case.

A (or The) correct way to find the average is via average value theorem.
f_{avg}(x)=\frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b}f(x)

Which in the case of \sin^2(\theta) yields f_{avg}=\frac{1}{2}
 
  • #12
I have a problem that has been bugging me all year. Yes, all year - which i know is sad. can anyone tell me how to solve the following problem?

What is the power applied to a string that is 10 meters long, has a hertz of 440?

I can't really find a formula that i can understand. i don't know much about physics and this was a problem from last semesters final, as extra credit on a algebra test - go figure. anyway it is still bugging me.

thanks,
 
  • #13
Are you sure that is the whole question? That can't possibly be enough information to come up with an answer, surely...

Without knowing anything about the string, we could assume that it was a ideal (lossless) carrier of the wave, so the "power" would be the energy taken to excite it - however we aren't given the amplitude of the wave.

I'm assuming that the system is a string attached to a fixed point, being excited by the other end?

The question seems far to vague to have a numeric answer, and if they just wanted proof of understanding why did they give exact length/frequency instead of length of L, frequency of F Hz or such...
 
  • #14
i think i might have left off a part...something about the wavelength being 2 meters...would that help? if not then i will just have to try to get the question again.

thanks for looking at this for me ;-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K