How is the Variance in Particle Number Derived?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cryptist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Variance
cryptist
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
I saw an equation on wikipedia: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi-Dirac_statistics)

b17305ed57f454a2e9b8a2ef47dd3f82.png


Does anybody know how this is derived?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Express the mean partice number in therms of the grandcanonical partition function.
 
\langle N \rangle is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, which is derived on that wikipedia page. So, you can perform the derivative yourself and verify the second equality.

The first equality can be derived as follows. First,

\displaystyle \langle ( \Delta N )^2 \rangle = \langle (N - \langle N \rangle )^2 \rangle = \langle N^2 - 2 \langle N \rangle N + \langle N \rangle^2 \rangle = \langle N^2 \rangle - \langle N \rangle^2.

Next, at constant volume and temperature, the grand-canonical partition function is given as the sum over all states, s of the Gibbs factors, e^{- (e_s - \mu n_s ) / k_B T} (check out the wikipedia page on partition function if this is unfamiliar):

\displaystyle Z = \sum_s e^{- (e_s - \mu n_s )/ k_B T}.

Here e_s and n_s are the state energy and occupation number. The Gibbs factor of a state measures the relative probability that that state is occupied. Hence, by definition,

\displaystyle \langle N \rangle = \frac{\sum_s n_s e^{-(e_s - \mu n_s)/k_B T}}{\sum_s e^{- (e_s - \mu n_s ) / k_B T}}.

Given these formulas for Z and \langle N \rangle, you should be able to show that

\displaystyle \langle N \rangle = k_B T \frac{1}{Z} \frac{dZ}{d \mu}.

I've taken it for granted that the derivatives are taken at constant volume and temperature.

Analogously, show that

\displaystyle \langle N^2 \rangle = (k_B T)^2 \frac{1}{Z} \frac{d^2 Z}{d \mu^2}.

Okay. At this point, I think you have all of the formulas you need to derive the first equality that you quoted from wikipedia. Just a little bit of ingenuity left. Good luck.
 
Thank you for the answer!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top