How is this possible/ what does it mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the implications of equations related to traveling faster than the speed of light, specifically through the lens of general relativity. It highlights that traditional calculations yield imaginary numbers when attempting to exceed light speed, indicating a fundamental barrier. A proposed manipulation of the equation raises everything to the fourth power to avoid negative numbers, but this approach is criticized for lacking physical relevance. The mathematical operations performed do not yield a real, physical answer, as the imaginary roots remain valid. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the complexities and limitations of theoretical physics when addressing superluminal travel.
Edi
Messages
176
Reaction score
1
I am applying this to the General relativity .. stuff..
So, basically this [ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2/+sqrt(1-+400000000^2/300000000^2)) ] equation shows that it is pretty impossible to fly faster than the speed of light in vacuum, because the you have to deal with sqrt of negative numbers and that's just bad. Ok, fine. What else is new?

Oh, i know! This!: what if I take everything in the equation to the power of 4? Like this: [ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2^4/+sqrt(1-+400000000^2/300000000^2)^4) ]
of course, the result is in power of 4 too, but! - there is no negative numbers and problems!

This is a equation for mass increase while traveling at velocity near (faster? ) the speed of light in vacuum (c).
starting mass is 2(kg)
The resulting mass from traveling at 1.33 (?) c is ~26.45^1/4 .. well.. this : [ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2^4/+sqrt(1-+400000000^2/300000000^2)^4)^1/4 ]


Flying faster than c? No problem! ... except that there is a problem! :( - at least form my, not-that-much-educated, point of view.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You're just performing some mathematical manipulations that don't have any physical relevance. In particular, you're raising an imaginary number to the fourth power and taking the 4th root to get a real number. What you perhaps don't know is that when you take the nth root of a number, there are actually n solutions.

For example, take the number i. You know i^4 = 1. However, 1^(1/4) has four solutions: +1, -1, +i, -i.

So, at speeds faster than c you get an imaginary answer for \gamma m_0, but taking that to the fourth power and then taking the fourth root does not give you a physical answer that's real. The correct root is still the imaginary root you started with.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top