MHB How Is Trigonometry Used to Calculate Flagpole Heights?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ai93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
ai93
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
A vertical flagpole is fixed at the top of a vertical wall. From a point which is 120m measured horizontally from the base of the wall the angle of elevation to the top of the flagpole is 30 degrees, and the angle of elevation to the bottom of the flagpole is 25 degrees.

a) Draw a clearly labelled diagram to represent this situation

b) Calculate the length of the flagpole correct to 2 dp

View attachment 3811

I have attempted to draw the diagram, and hopefully figured the height out. Although I could be completely wrong!
 

Attachments

  • photo (4).JPG
    photo (4).JPG
    21.4 KB · Views: 120
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would draw the diagram as follows:

View attachment 3812

From this, we see:

$$\tan\left(25^{\circ}\right)=\frac{w}{120}\tag{1}$$

$$\tan\left(30^{\circ}\right)=\frac{w+h}{120}\tag{2}$$

Now, can you use (1) to eliminate $w$ in (2)?
 

Attachments

  • wallandflag.png
    wallandflag.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 100
MarkFL said:
I would draw the diagram as follows:

View attachment 3812

From this, we see:

$$\tan\left(25^{\circ}\right)=\frac{w}{120}\tag{1}$$

$$\tan\left(30^{\circ}\right)=\frac{w+h}{120}\tag{2}$$

Now, can you use (1) to eliminate $w$ in (2)?

$$\tan\left(25^{\circ}\right)=\frac{w}{120}\tag{1}$$

$$w=tan(25)x120=55.95$$

$$tan(30)=\frac{55.95+h}{120}$$

$$\therefore tan(30) \cdot 120 = 55.95+h$$

$$69.28+55.95+h$$

$$69.28-55.95=h$$

$$\therefore h=13.33$$

I think that's right

- - - Updated - - -

If I am given a similar question with two angles. The biggest angle would obviously be the outer angle?
 
I would rewrite (2) as:

$$\tan\left(30^{\circ}\right)=\frac{w}{120}+\frac{h}{120}$$

Then use (1) to obtain:

$$\tan\left(30^{\circ}\right)=\tan\left(25^{\circ}\right)+\frac{h}{120}$$

And then solving for $h$, we get (in meters):

$$h=120\left(\tan\left(30^{\circ}\right)-\tan\left(25^{\circ}\right)\right)\approx13.33$$

Your answer is correct, however, it is best to obtain the exact value first, and then only at the very end do your rounding. Sometimes intermediary rounding can cause your end result to be inaccurate.

Regarding which angle is larger, we know that if two rays have the same terminus, but one passes through a higher point over the same horizontal distance, then its angle of elevation must be greater. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top