How is work done by a gas in an irreversible process calculated?

AI Thread Summary
In irreversible processes, the work done by a gas can be calculated using the integral of P dV, but this only holds true for quasistatic processes where internal thermodynamic equilibrium is maintained. For non-quasistatic processes, the relationship between pressure and work becomes ambiguous, and the work done is typically less than the integral of P dV due to energy dissipation, such as internal friction. The first law of thermodynamics remains valid for both quasistatic and non-quasistatic changes, but the definitions of heat and work differ significantly in these contexts. In extreme cases, like free expansion in a vacuum, no work is performed despite changes in pressure and volume. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately calculating work in various thermodynamic processes.
zarbanx
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
work done in an reversible process is easy to find we have the function of P internal bt when it comes to irreversible process then how do we find work done by the gas or on it and if ur answer is (sry i am new to forum i don't know how to use the features) [ integration p external dv] then please explain why is it so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the same question from me... :(
 
The work done by a reversible process and irreversible process are the same. Work done is just the work done, entropy isn't going to change that.
 
What matters is if the process is quasistatic or not. Quasistatic means that the process proceeds slow enough for internal thermodynamic equilibrium to be maintained.

If the irreversible process is quasistatic then the work done is given by the integral of P dV. Consider e.g. an ideal gas that is expanding slowly while kept at constant temperature. The gas will do an equal amount of work as the heat it absorbs.

Quasistatic irreversible processes can always be realized in a completely reversible way. E.g. in the above case where the entropy of the gas increases due to absorbing heat, the heat can be supplied to the gas by a heat bath and the temperature difference between the heat bath and the gas can be made arbitrarily small. The entropy increase of the heat bath plus the entropy increase of the heat bath is then zero. The entire process is then reversible.

In case of non-quasistatic processes you can no longer apply the usual thermodynamic equations. Work done is then no longer given by the integral of P dV. In general you cannot even define the pressure for non-equilibrium processes in unambiguous way. But even if the pressure is well defined and the integral of P dV is well defined, it is not the same as the work done.

To see why this is the case, consider the first law of thermodynamics:

dE = dQ - dW (1)

which expresses conservation of energy: The change in internal energy is the absorbed heat minus the work done. In case of a quasistatic change of the system, we know that:

dQ = T dS (2)

and

dW = P dV (3)


Inserting (2) and (3) in (1) gives:



dE = T dS - P dV (4)


which is known as the fundamental thermodynamic relation. Now, even though this was derived assuming the change in the system was quasistatic, it is also valid for non-quasistatic changes. The reason is that the internal energy E is a thermodynamic state variable which can be uniquely specified by the entropy and volume. Then, if you change the volume and entropy, the internal energy change is some fixed quantity, independent of that change is realized (quasistatic or not).

But for non-quasistatic changes we know that (2) is not valid. In general we have:

T dS >= dQ (5)

Then since (4) must be valid no matter what, we have:

P dV = T dS - dE

Using (1) we get:

P dV = T dS - dQ + dW


Eq. (5) then implies:

P dV >= dW (6)


So, the work done in irreversible processes will, in general, be less than the integral of P dV. You have equality in the quasistatic case, even if the process is irreversible (but such processes can always be realized in a reversible way).

In some books reversible volume pressure work is defined to be any process in which the equality (3) holds. This can be justified because if (3) holds and you plug that in Eq. (4) , then you obtain (using Eq.(1)) Eq (2), which can always be realized in a reversible way.


Loosely speaking you can say that P dV is the work done but part of it can get lost due to internal friction. That internal friction can be considered to be heat (it will certainly lead to entropy increase). But because we define heat as energy that flows to the system from outside the system boundary, it is not the accounted for by the term dQ in the equations.

So, what you have is that part of the P dV is dissipated in the form of heat which then casuses the entropy change to be more than dQ/T, while the work that the system performs is less than P dV, because work done is energy that flows out of the system in the form of work performed on an external system and the part of the P dV that has been dissipated is no longer available for this.

An exteme example is free expansion of a gas in avacuum. In that case no work at all is performed, but this process is so violent that you can object by saying that the pressure of the gas is not well defined. But we can perform a free expansion in small steps by moving a piston very fast from one position to a slighly different position, faster than the gas can expand and then fixing the piston in that position.

Then what happens is that the gas expands and bumps into the piston in that new position. The P dV term is then equal to the increase in kinetic energy of the gas which comes at the expense of the internal energy, but this kinetic energy gets dissipated after a while, so the internal energy stays the same.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top