How Long Does It Take to Discharge Body's Electrostatic Potential?

AI Thread Summary
Electrostatic potential on the human body discharges almost instantaneously, typically within nanoseconds, as evidenced by experiences like touching a metal doorknob after walking on carpet. The discharge rate is influenced by the body's resonant frequency, with estimates suggesting it can occur in about 100 nanoseconds. While grounding techniques, such as using conductive sheets, are discussed for potential health benefits, skepticism exists regarding their efficacy, particularly in relation to minor electrostatic discharges. The complexity of the electrostatic model for the human body indicates that while some discharges can be rapid, the physiological effects of small discharges are likely minimal. Overall, while grounding may help avoid discomfort from static shocks, its claimed health benefits remain questionable.
EMC
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys--and Gals?

Here's a wierdie; One is always collecting potential on our bodies, frequently called electrostatic voltage.
I've found sound research that it is beneficial to "earth" or ground ourselves as often as possible to drain this off. Those last words are the question: does this potential discharge require more than microseconds or perhaps does it require some time for the excess electrons that have moved into orbits in one's bodies molecules to detach?
There are opinions that posit that it does take time so it is beneficial to sleep on a grounded conducting sheet with many health benefits anyone have any good information about this?

cheers
Michael
Electronic Measurement Consultants
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Michael
welcome to PF

have you ever walked across a carpet and then touched a metal doorknob etc ?
you feel that zap and hear the crack of the spark ?

the discharge is pretty much instantaneous :smile:

Dave
 
The rate of discharge would be related (order of magnitude) to the resonant frequency of the object in question. A 1.5m person would, perhaps (depending on the details of the connection) behave like a resonant monopole. A 1/4 wave monopole of 1.5m would resonate at about 100MHz. This would mean that the discharge might be expected to take a few 10ns periods (as the oscillations of the spark die down).

An alternative approach could be based on the speed of light being 0.3m/ns - which would give a timescale of, perhaps 5ns for a charge pulse to travel across the body.

There could be other valid ways of looking at it but I think it would all be over after, perhaps 100ns.
 
Hello Michael,

Electrostatic charging is caused by the difference in affinity for electrons between two materials which come in contact and are pulled apart. Rubbing seems to enhance the exchange.

Most early "Hard" discharge models were based upon an RC model of the human body that gave a simple exponential decay. Later models including inductive effects. The following paper sums it up.

http://www.aecouncil.com/Papers/aec1.pdf

For ESD protection in the lab, it's desirable to discharge the body slowly lest a sudden change in voltage is capacitively coupled to delicate equipment. Thus wrist straps have large value resistors between the person and ground.

I think physiological effects are minor for small discharges, and going overboard for grounding is likely silly. However, it is nice to avoid the occasional zap. That said, it's hard to beat cotton and a 30-45% relative humidity to stay comfortable.
 
Human body model for static discharge has a typical discharge rise time of 840ps and a typical decay time constant (not fall time) of 150ns. Min and max range from 11ps to 1.8ns rise time and 50ns to 1.5us decay time constant. The electrostatic model for human body discharge is complex, to say the least.

Using a 1K, 150pf simplified model for a 10KV discharge you get a 10A pulse with a 1ns rise time falling to about half in 100ns. (typical for static discharge testing)

I'm dubious (putting it lightly) about "sound" research that implies health benefits for sleeping on "grounded sheets" or staying discharged. (other than avoiding getting hit after touching your spouse on the ear) I'll bet it's hard to find a "paper" by someone who isn't selling the solution. But I do know that staying discharged will favorably affect the health of any CMOS circuits you may be handling.
 
Mike_In_Plano said:
Electrostatic charging is caused by the difference in affinity for electrons between two materials which come in contact and are pulled apart. Rubbing seems to enhance the exchange.


QUOTE]

Don't forget that electrostatic charging is also caused by the induction method. No contact or rubbing necessary.

Cheers, Bobbywhy
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top