How Long To 'FreeFall' Into TON 618 From ISCO

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the time it would take for a planet to free fall into the supermassive black hole TON 618, located approximately 3900 AU from its event horizon. The mass of TON 618 is noted to be 66 billion solar masses. By applying Kepler's equations and disregarding relativistic effects, participants estimate that the free fall would take just under three months. The conversation also touches on the implications of spaghettification and the potential for celestial bodies to remain intact for a short duration beyond the event horizon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's equations
  • Basic knowledge of Newtonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with black hole physics, particularly ISCO (Innermost Stable Circular Orbit)
  • Ability to perform unit conversions, especially involving gravitational constants
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of relativity on free fall into black holes
  • Study the concept of spaghettification in relation to black holes
  • Explore advanced gravitational physics, including the Schwarzschild radius
  • Examine the implications of the holographic principle in black hole physics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophysicists, and students studying gravitational physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in black hole dynamics and relativistic effects.

Daharen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I'm trying to help someone get an idea of the 'scale' of some of the most massive black holes, but, I'm at best a laymen when it comes to this stuff. Because ISCO for a non-rotating black hole is just 3 times it's radius, and I can calculate apparent arc radius from ISCO, I could tell them how large it would appear if our solar system orbited the black hole at the ISCO, but then I was asked how long it would take to 'fall' into the black hole if we suddenly stopped orbiting (A very similar question to the classic how long it would take to fall into the sun if the Earth stopped orbiting, but on a very different scale).

Now... I imagine this gets quite complicated quite fast since at this point we're not just dealing with simple Newtonian Mechanics, but probably a lot of relativistic stuff too.. However, if we can disregard relativity for the sake of this conversation, how long would it take for a planet that was orbiting TON 618 at about 3900 AU from it's Event Horizon, and suddenly stopped orbiting and went into free fall, to reach the event horizon, which is about 1300 AU from the singularity, given a mass of 66 Billion Solar Masses?

If this is beyond the reasonable scope of this forum I understand, I tried really hard to work with calculators to find the answers, but couldn't account for the change in acceleration over time (Integral Calculus is definitely not my strong point).
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Daharen said:
So I'm trying to help someone get an idea of the 'scale' of some of the most massive black holes, but, I'm at best a laymen when it comes to this stuff. Because ISCO for a non-rotating black hole is just 3 times it's radius, and I can calculate apparent arc radius from ISCO, I could tell them how large it would appear if our solar system orbited the black hole at the ISCO, but then I was asked how long it would take to 'fall' into the black hole if we suddenly stopped orbiting (A very similar question to the classic how long it would take to fall into the sun if the Earth stopped orbiting, but on a very different scale).

Now... I imagine this gets quite complicated quite fast since at this point we're not just dealing with simple Newtonian Mechanics, but probably a lot of relativistic stuff too.. However, if we can disregard relativity for the sake of this conversation, how long would it take for a planet that was orbiting TON 618 at about 3900 AU from it's Event Horizon, and suddenly stopped orbiting and went into free fall, to reach the event horizon, which is about 1300 AU from the singularity, given a mass of 66 Billion Solar Masses?

If this is beyond the reasonable scope of this forum I understand, I tried really hard to work with calculators to find the answers, but couldn't account for the change in acceleration over time (Integral Calculus is definitely not my strong point).

If you disregard relativity you can plug it into the Kepler's equations. Falling straight in is equivalent to a very narrow ellipse so R/2 is semi-major axis.
6eef38a3451178fbcc02ad1adb570faac27538f5


You can probably disregard m. M is the hole mass 6.6x 1010, G is constant but convert M into kilogram. R is just distance but should match units used for G.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Daharen
Thank you, I did work it out eventually using this, I weirdly came up with 'roughly' the exact same amount of time it would take for Earth to free-fall into the sun for the solar system to free-fall into the black hole from its ISCO... Is this just a coincidence, or is there some mechanical reason that it would work out this way? FYI, the math works out to just a bit under three months of free fall before we enter the event horizon. Turns out that the solar system would begin to experience spaghettification even with the largest black hole, but individual bodies like the Earth could actually remain entact for a 'short while' beyond the event horizon (Ignoring the photon sphere, holographic principle, or any other ideas that would prohibit the possibility of passing the event horizon at all entact). Acceleration has to be 'stopped' at some point because it exceeds light speed if you don't account for relativity, so obviously this answer is grossly inaccurate at some point, but still a fascinating thought experiment.

I would love to see the answer for this problem incorporating relativity to the full extent possible, but I wouldn't even know where to begin. In either case, thank you for providing me with the formula it was extremely helpful. Sorry about the delay in my reply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K