MHB How long will it take 4 people to decorate a house

  • Thread starter Thread starter gazparkin
  • Start date Start date
gazparkin
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
There may be a simple way of answering this but I'm stumped! it takes 10 people 6 days to decorate a house. how long will it take 4 people?

Any help appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ever heard the term "man-hours" to complete a job? This is very similar in units, except it's "people-days" ...

1 house decorated by 10 people in 6 days means it takes 60 people-days (same as 60 days for 1 person to finish decorating the house)

(60 people-days to finish a house)/(4 people working) = 15 days to finish
 
skeeter said:
Ever heard the term "man-hours" to complete a job? This is very similar in units, except it's "people-days" ...

1 house decorated by 10 people in 6 days means it takes 60 people-days (same as 60 days for 1 person to finish decorating the house)

(60 people-days to finish a house)/(4 people working) = 15 days to finish

Thanks for this Skeeter. So the calculation is people X days (in the original calculation) then divide by however number of people are in the question?
 
The more people you have the less time it will take. This is an "inverse" proportion. You have 4/10= 2/5 as many people so it will take 10/4= 5/2 as long.

(Also, this is assuming that each person works at the same rate no matter how many people there are. If "decorating" involved lifting some object so heavy it takes 5 people to lift it, 4 could never finish!)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top