How Long Will It Take for the Sun to Convert 12% of Its Hydrogen into Helium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ant284
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Sun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating how long it will take for the Sun to convert 12% of its hydrogen into helium. The initial calculations suggest that this process will take approximately 9.4 billion years, based on the energy released per reaction and the Sun's energy output. Participants confirm the accuracy of this estimate, with one contributor performing a parallel calculation that yields a similar result. The conversation highlights the complexity of stellar processes and the importance of collaborative problem-solving in understanding astrophysical phenomena. Overall, the calculations and discussions affirm that the timeframe for this hydrogen conversion is indeed around 9.4 billion years.
ant284
Hi
I have the following question
4Hydrogen->Helium+2electrons+2neutrino+gamma

In the sun, Hydrogen is converted into helium(see equation above) and that the reaction releases about 26.7MeV of energy. the sun radiates energy at the rate of 3.9*10^26W and has a mass about 1.99*10^30 kg of which 75% is hydrogen. Find out how long it will take the sun to convert 12% of its hydrogen into helium.

I'm abit blocked. anyhelp is appreciated
I think i have the right ideas.
For Four hydrogen into helium is 26.7Mev or 4.272*10^-12Joules.
now a hydrogen is about 1.008 or 1.0u or 1* (1.66*10^-27)kg.
so I do, (1.99*10^30) *.75=1.425*10^30kg and
i do answer * .12 to get those 12% of hydrogen to helium
1.42*10^30 * .12 = 1.79*10^29kg.
so i can do (1.79*10^29)/(1.66*10^-27) to get the number of Hydrogen
so i get 1.08*10^56 hydrogen.
since 4 Hydrogen into helium i divide by the total number of hydrogen to get
(1.08*10^56)/4=2.7*10^55
i multiply 2.7*10^55 by 26.7MeV to get the total energy output.
so i get
(2.7*10^55)*(4.272*10^-12)=1.15344*10^44

and since
watts=J/S, so i do 1/(3.9*10^26) * (1.15344*10^44) and i get
2.96*10^17 seconds.
I could get it into years by dividing the answer by (60*60*24*365) and i get about
9.4*10^9 years.

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello ant, you say you are blocked and want help but it seems to me that you are doing well and that you have gotten a reasonable answer namely about 10 billion years.

Perhaps at the end of this time the sun will go red giant and
start burning helium?

Would it help if one of us would do a parallel calculation and see if we get the same 10 billion years, or 9.4 billion or whatever?

Originally posted by ant284
Hi
I have the following question
4Hydrogen->Helium+2electrons+2neutrino+gamma

In the sun, Hydrogen is converted into helium(see equation above) and that the reaction releases about 26.7MeV of energy. the sun radiates energy at the rate of 3.9*10^26W and has a mass about 1.99*10^30 kg of which 75% is hydrogen. Find out how long it will take the sun to convert 12% of its hydrogen into helium.

I'm abit blocked. anyhelp is appreciated
I think i have the right ideas.
For Four hydrogen into helium is 26.7Mev or 4.272*10^-12Joules.
now a hydrogen is about 1.008 or 1.0u or 1* (1.66*10^-27)kg.
so I do, (1.99*10^30) *.75=1.425*10^30kg and
i do answer * .12 to get those 12% of hydrogen to helium
1.42*10^30 * .12 = 1.79*10^29kg.
so i can do (1.79*10^29)/(1.66*10^-27) to get the number of Hydrogen
so i get 1.08*10^56 hydrogen.
since 4 Hydrogen into helium i divide by the total number of hydrogen to get
(1.08*10^56)/4=2.7*10^55
i multiply 2.7*10^55 by 26.7MeV to get the total energy output.
so i get
(2.7*10^55)*(4.272*10^-12)=1.15344*10^44

and since
watts=J/S, so i do 1/(3.9*10^26) * (1.15344*10^44) and i get
2.96*10^17 seconds.
I could get it into years by dividing the answer by (60*60*24*365) and i get about
9.4*10^9 years.

Any help is appreciated.
 
For fun, I will do the calculation in natural units (c=G=hbar=k=1).

the sun's mass is 93E36

12 percent of 75 percent is 9 percent

9 percent of 93E36 is 8.37E36 (the Planck masses of H to consume)

The mass of H is 1/13E18, so the number of H to consume is
13E18 x 8.37E36 = 1.1E56.

But each H consumed supplies 6.675 MeV, which is 5.5E-22

therefore 6E34 Planck energy units must be released!

[this figure for the total energy release seems to be critical]

Now in natural units, the assumed power of 3.9E26 watts is equal to 1.07E-26

So one simply asks how long does it take to deliver an amount of energy 6E34 at the rate 1.07E-26

The answer is 5.6E60. This is Planck units of time and may be converted to 3.0E17 seconds or to 9.5 billion years.

I have generally be using a little more accuracy than I have been bothering to write down. I am fairly confident of the figure and see that it agrees substantially with your 9.4 billion years.

Is this satisfactory?
 
Hi

Thank you, the funny thing is that i was really blocked! before writting the question on the forum, then i wrote the step to show my working, and I was thinking about it, and suddently i got the correct answer just by writting to this forum.
Very strange

Thank you
 
Originally posted by ant284
Hi

Thank you, the funny thing is that i was really blocked! before writting the question on the forum, then i wrote the step to show my working, and I was thinking about it, and suddently i got the correct answer just by writting to this forum.
Very strange

Thank you

perhaps not so strange or even so unusual

it may help one to think if one has (even an imaginary)
someone to talk to and explain things to.

here is a bit of solar trivia for you:

in a cubic kilometer of space, at this distance from the sun, how many photons of sunlight are there?

I am in northern california and you are in france. probably we often walk outside and look at the sunlight. Think about the occupation of space by sunlight quanta----how many are there in the volume around you?

it would be rather easy to calculate for you, I think.
perhaps it is a "general culture" number which one should know!
I happened to calculate it in cubic miles rather than cubic kilometers and there are 1023 photons in a cubic mile.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top