I How many combinations of unique arrangements are there?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the number of unique arrangements of 3D pixel cubes in a 1 billion x 1 billion x 1 billion cube, with half black and half clear. While permutations of these pixels yield a finite number, the potential arrangements or shapes can be infinite. A simplified example using a 4x4x4 cube suggests that the total combinations can be calculated using binomial coefficients, specifically 64C32, leading to a large number of combinations. For the larger cube, the total unique arrangements are expressed as 2 raised to the power of the total number of pixels, resulting in an astronomically large figure. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between permutations and combinations in mathematical terms.
question99
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If there was a 1 billion x 1 billion x 1 billion cube made of 3D pixel cubes, and half of them are black and half of them are clear/colorless, then how many combinations of unique pixel arrangements are there?

Would the amount of shapes/objects in this cube be infinite? (Assuming the black pixels represent solids)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
question99 said:
If there was a 1 billion x 1 billion x 1 billion cube made of 3D pixel cubes, and half of them are black and half of them are clear/colorless, then how many combinations of unique pixel arrangements are there?

Would the amount of shapes/objects in this cube be infinite? (Assuming the black pixels represent solids)
You have posited a finite number of things. How would you get from finite to infinite?
 
First you could simplify the combinations of pixel cubes to 4x4x4, so 64 pixels total with 32 black and clear. To simplify the cube you could make it a string 64 pixels long that would be folded into a cube after arrangement. Then to find all possible permutations you would do: 64P32=4.822199248906x1053 total possible combinations. This would be bigger with a billion3 pixels.
This is their total possible combinations as a cube but also as a string, so this is the total possible combinations for any shape and as you could arrange it into an infinite number of shapes in space. The combinations of shape would be infinite, but the permutations would be finite.
 
StanEvans said:
First you could simplify the combinations of pixel cubes to 4x4x4, so 64 pixels total with 32 black and clear. To simplify the cube you could make it a string 64 pixels long that would be folded into a cube after arrangement. Then to find all possible permutations you would do: 64P32=4.822199248906x1053 total possible combinations. This would be bigger with a billion3 pixels.
This is their total possible combinations as a cube but also as a string, so this is the total possible combinations for any shape and as you could arrange it into an infinite number of shapes in space. The combinations of shape would be infinite, but the permutations would be finite.
Sorry I got it wrong, for my example of a 4x4x4 it would be 64C32~1.83x1018. So with 1 billion it would be 1 billion cubed choose half one billion cubed. I can't find any calculator to find this value, but it will be the 10000000003/2 th entry on the 10000000003 th line on Pascal's triangle.
 
You've used the word "combinations" in a way that isn't the standard usage in mathematics. You should probably just omit the word and say, "How many unique pixel arrangements are there?". Then the answer is just 2^1000000000000000000000000000, which is a humongous number. Unless you did mean a combination, in which case, you should probably reword your question to be more clear.
 
For a set of 2N items, the number of subsets of size N is called 2NC2 ("2N choose 2") and is exactly equal to (2N!)/(N!)^2.

Stirling's approximation to K! is

K! ~ √(2πK) KK e-K.​

This gives

2NC2 ~ √(4πN) (2N)2N e-2N / (√(2πN) NN e-N)2

which simplifies to

22N / √(πN).​

For N = 109, this is approximately 3.7965 × 10602,059,986.

(Some calculators will say this is infinity.)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top