How many dimensions are involved in these sports motions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Inquiring_Mike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the dimensions involved in various sports motions. A motocross racer navigating a hilly track operates in three dimensions due to the terrain's complexity. A curler's stone, while not moving in a straight line, remains on a two-dimensional plane of the ice. A hockey player's puck pass is also primarily in two dimensions, depending on its trajectory. The train traveling on a straight track exemplifies one-dimensional motion, while the conversation hints at the importance of considering time and additional dimensions in sports analysis.
Inquiring_Mike
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I've been having trouble with these questions, I would greatly appreciate it if anyone could help to explain them to me.
Question:
Explain how many dimensions the following motion is taking place in.
- a motocross racer rides around a hilly track
- a curler shoots a rock down the ice, around a guard, and onto a button
- a hockey player passes the puck along the ice
- a golfer hits a slice into the woods
- a train travels along a straight section of a track
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anything that occurs on a single straight line is
1 dimensional, anything that occurs in a plane, but not a single straight line is 2 dimensional, any thing that occurs in a volume (not a single plane) is 3 dimensional.

Does the motorcylist ride in a straight line? Does he stay in a plane (on a flat surface)? What dimension are we talking about then?

A curler does not shoot the stone in a straight line (the problem said it goes around a guard) but does stay on the ice. What dimension is that?

A hockey player passes the puck along the ice. That sounds like a single plane. Does the puck curve or change direction?

Do you know what a slice is? That should give you the answer.

A train moving along a STRAIGHT section of track. Well, that was a give-away!
 
Don't forget the dimension of time (and brane dimensions as well!)
 
Originally posted by Loren Booda
Don't forget the dimension of time (and brane dimensions as well!)

This is the "Grade K-12 Forum", professor!
 
He could get extra credit... :wink:

(Or lose a mark because the teacher doesn't understand...:frown:)
 
Thanks everyone for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top