MHB How many homomorphisms are there from $\mathbb{Z}_4$ to $S_4$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homomorphisms
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :i

How many homomorphism $f:\mathbb{Z}_4\rightarrow S_4$ are there?

Do we have to find how many permutations of $S_4$ have order that divides $4$ ?

We have 1 identity (order 1), 6 transpositions (order 2), 3 products of two disjoint transpositions (order 2), 6 4-cycles (order 4).

So in total we have 1 + 6 + 3 + 6 = 16 elements of $S_4$ that have order that divides 4, right?

Does this mean that there are $16$ homomorphisms? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :i

How many homomorphism $f:\mathbb{Z}_4\rightarrow S_4$ are there?

Do we have to find how many permutations of $S_4$ have order that divides $4$ ?

We have 1 identity (order 1), 6 transpositions (order 2), 3 products of two disjoint transpositions (order 2), 6 4-cycles (order 4).

So in total we have 1 + 6 + 3 + 6 = 16 elements of $S_4$ that have order that divides 4, right?

Does this mean that there are $16$ homomorphisms? (Wondering)

Yep. (Nod)

For a homomorphism we need that $f(a)f(b)=ab$ for any $a,b$.
The structure of $\mathbb Z_4$ is fully identified by its generator $1$.
That means that it suffices indeed to look at $f(1)$, which fully identifies the homomorphism, and in particular verify that $f(1)^4=\text{id}$. (Nerd)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. (Nod)

For a homomorphism we need that $f(a)f(b)=ab$ for any $a,b$.
The structure of $\mathbb Z_4$ is fully identified by its generator $1$.
That means that it suffices indeed to look at $f(1)$, which fully identifies the homomorphism, and in particular verify that $f(1)^4=\text{id}$. (Nerd)

Ok! Thank you! (Yes)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
734
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
385
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K