How Many Influenza Viruses Land on You from a Cough?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anf9292
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Virus
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the number of influenza viruses that land on a person from a cough, using the volume of saliva and the size of the virus. The influenza A virus has a diameter of 85 nm, and the volume of saliva is given as 0.010 cm³, with 1/10^9 of that volume containing viral particles. The initial calculations suggest using the formula for the volume of a sphere to determine the volume of a single virus. There is a clarification needed on whether to divide the virus volume by the saliva volume or vice versa, and considerations regarding the spherical nature of both the virus and the saliva are mentioned. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the teacher's expectations for the calculation method.
anf9292
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A typical virus is a packet of protein and DNA (or RNA) and can be spherical in shape. The influenza A virus is a spherical virus that has a diameter of 85 nm. If the volume of saliva coughed onto you by your "friend" with the flu is 0.010 cm3 and 1/109 of that volume consists of viral particles, how many influenza viruses have just landed on you?


Homework Equations


V = 4/3 x pie x r^3


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking that I should take half of 85nm which is 42.5nm and plugging it into the volume formula for a spherical. The volume of the whole spherical virus comes out to be 3.21E-5.

3.21E-5 / 0.010cm^3 = .00321

1/10^9 of .00321 = 3.11E-7 particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its easier if you use nanometers in the original volume calculation. Secondly you would not divide the virus volume by the saliva volume, you need to do this the other way round. Thirdly I don't know if they want you take the spherical nature of the virus into account and assume spherical saliva which could make a big difference. You'll know what your teacher wants more than me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top