How many peaks in the interference pattern?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a diffraction experiment involving electrons scattered from a crystal, focusing on determining the number of peaks in the interference pattern and the spacing between atomic planes. The problem involves concepts from wave-particle duality and diffraction patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the angle of the first peak and the variable n, which represents the peak number. There is exploration of how to apply the wavelength and the diffraction equation to find the number of peaks. Questions arise about how to determine the maximum value of n before the equations yield unphysical results.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some suggesting that the number of peaks can be inferred from the values of n that lead to valid angles. There is acknowledgment of symmetry in the peak arrangement, and a participant suggests that the maximum n value leads to imaginary results, indicating a potential number of peaks.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the kinetic energy of the electrons and the need to calculate the wavelength, which is crucial for applying the diffraction equation. The discussion also hints at the constraints of the problem, such as the physical limits of n in the context of the diffraction pattern.

Abdul.119
Messages
73
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


In a diffraction experiment in which electrons of kinetic energy 110 eV are scattered from a crystal, a first maximum in the intensity of the scattered electrons occurs at an angle θ=10.7
a) How many peaks will there be in the interference pattern?
b) What is the spacing between the atom planes?

Homework Equations


2d sinθ = nλ
λ = h/p = h/√(2m KE)

The Attempt at a Solution


From the kinetic energy of the electron I found the wavelength to be 1.17*10^-10 m , then I don't understand how to use it in that equation, I believe n is the number of peaks, and d is the spacing, so how would I solve this equation while two variables are missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
n is the number of a given peak (well, the pair of peaks placed symmetrically about the centerline, where the central peak is for n = 0).

You're given the angle of the first peak for which n = 1. That should get you going. For more detail, take a look at the Hyperphysics entry on diffraction gratings.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/grating.html
 
gneill said:
n is the number of a given peak (well, the pair of peaks placed symmetrically about the centerline, where the central peak is for n = 0).

You're given the angle of the first peak for which n = 1. That should get you going. For more detail, take a look at the Hyperphysics entry on diffraction gratings.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/grating.html
Oh ok, so having n=1 will help me solve for the d, but how do I find how many peaks there are then?
 
Abdul.119 said:
Oh ok, so having n=1 will help me solve for the d, but how do I find how many peaks there are then?
Usually you'd look for values of n where the equations start giving un-physical results (like imaginary angles, or impossible (real) values for a trig function).
 
gneill said:
Usually you'd look for values of n where the equations start giving un-physical results (like imaginary angles, or impossible (real) values for a trig function).
Solving for the angle θ, I start getting imaginary numbers at n=6, so that means there are 5 peaks?
 
Abdul.119 said:
Solving for the angle θ, I start getting imaginary numbers at n=6, so that means there are 5 peaks?
Sounds reasonable. Those would be pairs of peaks, and don't forget symmetry and the central peak.
 
gneill said:
Sounds reasonable. Those would be pairs of peaks, and don't forget symmetry and the central peak.
Okay, thank you very much for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K